Which data sources or key indicators should we be watching that may indicate major changes in the risk assessment, or new risks hitherto unidentified arising?

Background

In the National AI Strategy, the government made commitments to enrich our understanding of AI as it impacts the economy and society more broadly. Additionally, we recently launched a steering board chaired by the heads of both the government analysis and scientific functions, to ensure cohesive cross government approaches to understanding AI impacts. An overview of the high-level questions we are asking in this regard are outlined in the section below. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-aistrategy)

Some priority work we are currently developing to meet these commitments include:

An analysis of the AI White Paper consultation to feed into the formal consultation response. This will allow us to take on feedback from the public and various key players in sectors across the economy, and better tailor policy interventions to support strategic AI aims.

Establishing the AI Safety Institute to advance the world’s knowledge of AI safety by carefully examining, evaluating, and testing new frontier AI systems. The Institute will conduct fundamental research on how to keep people safe in the face of fast and unpredictable progress in AI, improving our understanding of the capabilities and risks of AI systems.

A monitoring and evaluation framework for AI regulatory interventions in tandem with the AI regulatory white paper. This will develop our understanding of key metrics to monitor with regards to Ai governance and ecosystem impacts.

Research into the AI sector and supply. Updating the AI Sector Study to establish a consistent and comparable set of economic indicators for the AI sector in terms of producers and suppliers. This study helps us to best understand where the AI sector needs support, to grow sovereign capability of the UK in AI, in alignment with strategic priorities.

The development of a cross-economy national AI risk register. Developed in tandem with a responsibility register that garnered cross Whitehall agreement on which departments hold which risks with regards to AI. The risk register will provide a single source of truth on AI risks which regulators, government departments, and external groups can use to prioritise further action.

Further research into Compute and the best ways to leverage compute to support the AI sector. This will be key to informing our response to the future of compute review, and maximising the £1 billion+ investments in state-of-the-art compute.

Next steps

If you are keen to register your interest in working and connecting with DSIT Digital Technology and Telecoms Group and/or submitting evidence, then please complete the DSIT-ARI Evidence survey - https://dsit.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cDfmK2OukVAnirs.
Please view full details: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-for-science-innovation-and-technology-areas-of-research-interest/dsit-areas-of-research-interest-2024

Related UKRI funded projects


  • ENFIELD: European Lighthouse to Manifest Trustworthy and Green AI

    ENFIELD will create a unique European Centre of Excellence that excels the fundamental research in the scientific pillars of Adaptive, Green, Human-Centric, and Trustworthy AI that are new, strategic and of paramount imp...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it focuses on AI research and development, but does not specifically address data sources or key indicators for risk assessment.

  • AI UK: Creating an International Ecosystem for Responsible AI Research and Innovation

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) can have dramatic effects on industrial sectors and societies (e.g., Generative AI, facial recognition, autonomous vehicles). AI UK will pioneer a reflective, inclusive approach to responsibl...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Southampton

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it focuses on responsible AI research and innovation, but does not specifically address data sources or key indicators for risk assessment.

  • ELIAS: European Lighthouse of AI for Sustainability

    We live in a crucial historical moment, with tremendous challenges ahead, from climate change to the energy crisis. ELIAS emerges from the belief that AI will be a key discipline to help us tackle these challenges. At th...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it focuses on AI for sustainability, but does not specifically address data sources or key indicators for risk assessment.

  • UKRI Trustworthy Autonomous Systems Hub

    Public opinion on complex scientific topics can have dramatic effects on industrial sectors (e.g. GM crops, fracking, global warming). In order to realise the industrial and societal benefits of Autonomous Systems, they ...

    Funded by: SPF

    Lead research organisation: University of Southampton

  • GRAIL (Guide to Regulation & AI Laws) A natural language process approach to discovery of AI regulations & laws.

    AI has the potential to transform our understanding of the world and help resolve many persistent human and environmental concerns. This transformative potential has stimulated the creation of a plethora of guidelines, d...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: ORBIT RRI LIMITED

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it focuses on AI laws and regulations, not specifically on data sources or key indicators for risk assessment.

Similar ARIs from other organisations