How can the health and safety implications of AI outputs be predicted, controlled, or explained?
Background
HSE Strategic Objective: Maintain Great Britain’s record as one of the safest countries to work in (https://www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/assets/docs/the-hse-strategy.pdf)
The legislation under which HSE operates has enabled Great Britain to become one of the safest places in the world to work through a combination of our extensive proactive regulatory work, enforcement, and prosecutions. To underpin policy, regulatory and operational activities in this strategic objective the evidence requirements in this area will include:
To develop the existing system of ongoing data collection, analysis, interpretation and result dissemination so that it remains fit for purpose to enable appropriate targeting of interventions and enforcement to maintain safety performance.
To extract insight and intelligence from data to develop data driven solutions which will improve safety performance by building on our learning and knowledge from the Discovering Safety programme.
To further develop understanding of the current and future world of work to ensure that our regulatory approach remains suitable and sufficient, taking account of any social, demographic and technological changes (including artificial intelligence).
To maintain and develop our risk models and evidence that supports statutory requirements and regulatory regimes to maintain safety within major hazard industries.
The questions provide more detail of the evidence needs within the main Areas of Research Interest Question Group.
Next steps
Get in touch: [email protected]
Source
This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:
Topics
No topics assigned yet
Research fields
No research fields assigned yet
Related UKRI funded projects
-
Weaving an AI Safety Net for UK and Canada
In response to the increasing international recognition of the harms arising from the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems and the emergent establishment of AI Safety Institutes in multiple countries,...
Funded by: AHRC
Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield
Why might this be relevant?
Partially addresses the question by focusing on AI safety framework and policy recommendations, but does not specifically address health and safety implications.
-
ENFIELD: European Lighthouse to Manifest Trustworthy and Green AI
ENFIELD will create a unique European Centre of Excellence that excels the fundamental research in the scientific pillars of Adaptive, Green, Human-Centric, and Trustworthy AI that are new, strategic and of paramount imp...
Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee
Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM
Why might this be relevant?
Partially relevant as it focuses on Trustworthy AI but not specifically on health and safety implications.
-
Network for Regulatory Innovation in Safetytech (NRIS)
Industrial Safetytech (IS) is an evolving field aiming to enhance workplace safety through innovative technologies. Despite advancements, workplace injuries have plateaued, evident in 38,211 serious accidents reported to...
Funded by: Innovate UK
Lead research organisation: SAFETYTECH ACCELERATOR LIMITED
Why might this be relevant?
Fully relevant as it addresses workplace safety through innovative technologies and regulatory alignment.