Adoption: How do adopted children, young people and their families experience situations where the child or young person can no longer live with their adoptive family, and what are the protective factors that promote family stability and help families stay together?
Background
The Independent Care Review made clear that stability and relationships must sit at the heart of children’s care. It highlighted that children should be “actively supported to develop relationships with people in the workforce and wider community” who are able to provide consistency, listen and act with compassion. It also emphasised that unnecessary moves, disruptions in care, and changes in social workers can damage trust, wellbeing, and long‑term outcomes. Ensuring stability is therefore about both where children live and who they interact with.
Despite this, we still do not fully understand how instability such as moves between homes whilst in the care system, changes in caregivers, or frequent turnover in social workers affects outcomes for children at different ages, nor what local factors help prevent disruption. More evidence is needed to understand the implications of instability for babies, children and young people, and what kinds of support, investment, or system changes can promote secure and lasting relationships.
Helping support a child’s pathway to permanence is central to ensuring they experience stable, loving relationships and a secure sense of home, and avoid prolonged uncertainty. This requires timely, well‑informed decisions about the right long‑term care arrangement for each child. Drift and delay can both prolong a child’s pathway to permanence, and more evidence is needed around the related causes, outcomes, and successful mitigations.
Next steps
Get in touch with [email protected]
Research fields
Related UKRI funded projects
-
Care pathways and outcomes: The teenage years
Across the UK, when children enter care, they live in a range of different placements, such as foster care, kinship care (with relatives or friends), adoption or with their birth parents. However, adoptive placements are...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of Ulster
Why might this be relevant?
This project specifically focuses on the stability of placements for children in care, which directly addresses the question about the experiences of adopted children and young people in different placement types.
-
From care, to adoption, to parenting: a two generation study of identity, risk and resilience in adoptive families
For 20 years UK policy has encouraged the adoption of children from care, and tens of thousands are now of an age where they could become a parent. This compulsory form of adoption is controversial at home and abroad and...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of East Anglia
Why might this be relevant?
While this project focuses on the lifespan effects of adoption and identity issues, it partially addresses the question by exploring the experiences of adopted people who are now parents.
-
The role of foster carers in meeting children's developmental and identity needs in England, Portugal and Spain
The number of children who are removed from their birth families for reasons such as neglect and/or abuse and are placed in care has been increasing over the years. Foster care is the widely preferred type of placement f...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of East Anglia
Why might this be relevant?
This project explores the role of foster carers in meeting children's developmental and identity needs, which is related to the question about protective factors that promote family stability.