How does procedural justice and (subjective) fairness vary by jurisdiction, and protected characteristics? What is effective in improving user perceptions of procedural justice and fairness?

Background

The objective for MoJ goal is to deliver a modern, sustainable and resilient criminal justice system, which ensures timely progression of cases through the courts and supports victims and witnesses to engage with, and feel confident in, the justice system. We want to strengthen our understanding of what works to achieve these aims at each stage.

Next steps

Get in touch with [email protected]

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Everyday Challenges to the Rule of Law: The Case of Civil/Criminal Procedural Hybrids

    Rules of legal procedure determine the steps to be taken and standards to be met in the resolution of issues coming before the law. Due to their different purposes - criminal law being to punish, civil law to compensate ...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Leeds

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it discusses civil/criminal procedural hybrids, but does not directly address procedural justice and fairness variations by jurisdiction and protected characteristics.

  • Legal norms and crime control: A comparative, cross-national analysis

    This is a comparative, cross-national study into attitudes towards legal authorities, compliance with the law, cooperation with legal authorities, and the policing of minority and majority groups. The proposal is to addr...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: London School of Economics and Political Science

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it discusses attitudes towards legal authorities and compliance with the law, but does not directly address procedural justice and fairness variations by jurisdiction and protected characteristics.

  • Victims' access to justice through English criminal courts, 1675 to the present

    This interdisciplinary project examines public access to justice in England over three centuries - from the 1670s to the present. Bringing together leading criminologists and crime historians, it will assemble and analys...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Essex

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it examines victims' access to justice through English criminal courts over centuries, but does not directly address procedural justice and fairness variations by jurisdiction and protected characteristics.

  • Putting Cognitive Science to Work in the Legal System: An Evidence-Based Approach to Testimony Evaluation and Beyond (Renewal)

    My FLF project involves a systematic and interdisciplinary line of research drawing on techniques from across fields to examine and improve testimony evaluation in the justice system, and to promote the effective integra...

    Funded by: UKRI FLF

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on improving testimony evaluation in the justice system and promoting the integration of cognitive science research, which aligns with the goal of understanding procedural justice and fairness.

  • Administrative Justice Network

    The proposed events aim to reenergise the debate about the administrative justice system looking forward and targeting pressing issues. The Administrative Justice System is about how government treats people - ideally it...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Westminster

    Why might this be relevant?

    While the project aims to reenergize the debate about the administrative justice system, it does not directly address the specific aspects of procedural justice and fairness variation by jurisdiction and protected characteristics.