What might a new more effective/efficient approach or dynamic between central government, local authorities and other partners (including communities/residents themselves) look like, and how could this help to improve specific outcomes in a place?

Background

Including bringing together further evidence on what the social and economic impact of having a more integrated and cohesive place is.

Next steps

The lead contacts are: Lesley Smith, Senior Principal Research Officer, Analysis, Research and Co-ordination Unit, Analysis and Data Directorate: Lesley.Smith@levellingup.gov.uk and David Hughes, Head of the Chief Scientific Adviser’s office: psChiefScientificAdviser@levellingup.gov.uk.

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

DLUHC Areas of research interest GOVUK

Related UKRI funded projects

  • Ways of neighbourhood working and knowing

    The background for this seminar series lies in the introduction of Localism Act 2011. Since then, wherever parish councils do not exist, local people (or businesses) can set up neighbourhood forums to work collaborativel...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Bristol

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question by providing information on neighbourhood working and localism, but does not fully address the question of improving specific outcomes in a place.

  • Localism and connected neighbourhood planning

    Under reforms to the English planning system, new powers are being granted to communities to draw up neighbourhood plans in an attempt to produce the 'Big Society'. These plans will take precedence over development plans...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Birmingham

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question by discussing localism and connected neighbourhood planning, but does not fully address the question of improving specific outcomes in a place.

  • LPIP Strategic Co-ordination Hub - What Works Centre for Place

    This 44-month project will establish "LPIP Strategic Co-ordination Hub - What Works Centre for Place" as the Local Policy Innovation Partnership (LPIP) Strategic Co-ordination Hub. This will involve bringing to...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Birmingham

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project is relevant as it aims to establish a hub that brings together various stakeholders to improve place-based policy making and public service delivery, which aligns with the question's focus on improving specific outcomes in a place through a new dynamic between central government, local authorities, and other partners.

  • Reframing Citizen Relationships with the Public Sector in a Time of Austerity: Community Empowerment in England and Scotland

    This project will examine the Scottish and UK public sector's approach to community empowerment and its impact on fostering citizen-state relationships in a time of austerity. Launching its 'Big Society Agenda', the UK C...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: Durham University

  • Transformational Routemapping for Urban Environments (TRUE)

    UK Cities face wide-ranging challenges including: inequality, crime, housing shortages, infrastructure congestion, carbon dependency, environmental degradation, and low skills. Local governments are working to address th...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Leeds

  • Jam and Justice: Co-producing Urban Governance for Social Innovation

    Our cities are in crisis. There are real uncertainties about issues such as austerity, economic growth, diversity and sustainability. Most people are beginning to recognise that existing ways of working aren't delivering...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

  • What Works Scotland Centre

    What Works Scotland will be a collaborative centre bringing together staff from the Universities of Glasgow and Edinburgh, other academics and key non-academic partners. Its aim is to support the use of evidence to plan ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Glasgow

  • From Citizen to Co-innovator, from City Council to Facilitator: Integrating Urban Systems to Provide Better Outcomes for People (BOP)

    The Urban Living Birmingham (ULB) Consortium brings together the expertise of four universities; national and international academic institutions; and very many local, regional and national organisations. The core academ...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Birmingham

  • Knowledge Exchange: Improved community engagement through spatial and visualisation methods (ICE-SAV)

    New approaches to engage with different communities (residents of particular neighbourhoods but also groups with different expertise or knowledge - communities of interest) that incorporate or combine spatial (mapped bas...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of York

  • Facing inequalities and democratic challenges through co-production in cities

    If the link between inequalities and declining levels of trust in the political institutions of democracy in Europe has already been shown, the various ways in which both citizens and institutions are trying to face thes...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: JUST SPACE

Similar ARIs from other organisations

Behavioural and social science How can local governance best be coordinated with national? Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2021
See details
Behavioural and social science What principles should be used to delegate responsibilities to local communities, and how can these areas be empowered to deliver? Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2021
See details