How can we develop pathways towards net zero that are socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable? What is the range of viable solutions, and what are the associated co-benefits and trade-offs? This includes developing spatially explicit models and tools to inform decisions at the landscape level, including prioritisation of conflicting land use demands

Background

To limit future warming requires rapid reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and achieving net zero by 2050, as required by UK legislation. Climate mitigation is led in government by the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). But Defra is responsible for efforts to reduce GHG emissions from four sectors: agriculture, waste and wastewater, land-use, and fluorinated gases (F-gases). Defra also has responsibility to promote forestry, which acts as a carbon sink. Together, the four Defra sectors represent 15% of the total net UK GHGs, with agriculture being the biggest contributor (about 10% of UK emissions).

Defra has research interests in reduction of emissions, the removal of GHG from the atmosphere, and in understanding the impacts of mitigation activities on other environmental outcomes.

Next steps

Get in touch with ari.comment@go-science.gov.uk

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

DEFRA Research and innovation interests GOVUK

Related UKRI funded projects

  • Land Use for Net Zero Hub

    We live in the critical decade for climate change. The world increasingly experiences the damages and losses from extreme weather events caused by human-made climate change. Crop losses, devastating floods, catastrophic ...

    Funded by: BBSRC

    Lead research organisation: James Hutton Institute

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project specifically focuses on developing pathways towards net zero by addressing land use changes, greenhouse gas emissions, and policy decisions.

  • Greenhouse Gas Removal in the Land Sector - Addressing the Gaps (GGRiLS - Gaps)

    Greenhouse Gas Removal in the Land Sector - Addressing the Gaps (GGRiLS - Gaps) is a Topic-specific proposal under the GGR programme. The Paris agreement commits countries to limit climate warming to "well below 2 d...

    Funded by: NERC

    Lead research organisation: University of Bristol

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project addresses the question fully and the authors have the necessary expertise.

  • Meeting the Paris Agreement on Climate: Exploiting Earth System Models to determine the role of future land-use change

    This Fellowship will exploit the next generation of climate models to make the UK's first assessment of the potential for land-use change policy (e.g., reduced deforestation and increased afforestation) to help society m...

    Funded by: NERC

    Lead research organisation: University of Leeds

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project addresses the question fully and the authors have the necessary expertise.

  • Greenhouse Gas Removal Plus (GGR+): Sustainable Treescapes Demonstrator & Decision Tools

    Due to the need for climate change action, UK Government has committed to the ambitious task of achieving 'net zero' greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. However, some emissions from farming, aviation and other activities a...

    Funded by: UKRI

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project addresses the question fully and the authors have the necessary expertise.

  • The Net-Zero Emissions Challenge: Quantifying unintended climate feedbacks from large-scale deployment of land-based CO2 removal strategies

    Over the past decades, carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the atmosphere have increased rapidly, to the point that the Earth's temperature has not fully adjusted to the new warmer climate. This means that even if car...

    Funded by: FLF

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

  • Nature-based Carbon Removal Verification

    * This project will provide a robust and quantitative assessment of nature-based carbon capture in the UK, and the requirements for scaleup of this method for meaningful climate change mitigation & adaptation * We wi...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: TREECONOMY LTD

  • Enabling nature-based carbon offsetting in Oxfordshire

    **Background** All the local authority project partners have ambitious carbon reduction targets, are working towards net zero carbon by 2030, and are encouraging the wider districts to become carbon neutral. Building o...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: SOUTH OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL

  • Climate Solutions Exchange Ltd

    The Covid-19 pandemic has accentuated the Climate Emergency and the need for a Green Recovery, accelerating the requirement for the business world to de-carbonise and become more environmentally sustainable; whilst also ...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: CLIMATE SOLUTIONS EXCHANGE LIMITED

  • A practical tool and robust framework for evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from land-based activities

    Limiting the impacts of climate change will require concerted action across all sectors. Emission reduction polices have previously focussed on fossil fuels, as the major cause of global warming, but the scale of the cha...

    Funded by: UKRI

    Lead research organisation: University of Oxford

  • ADD-TREES: AI-elevated Decision-support via Digital Twins for Restoring and Enhancing Ecosystem Services

    The UK's ambitions to achieve Net Zero by 2050 depend critically on large-scale greenhouse gas removal (GGR) that can offset emissions from difficult-to-decarbonise sectors. Capturing carbon in growing trees represents t...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

Similar ARIs from other organisations

Global prosperity, development and climate change (guiding research) What measures could help minimise the risks of de-forestation, biodiversity, and habitat loss in producer countries, without creating excessive trade distortion? Department for International Trade, 2020
See details
What is the evidence on the most efficient means of securing environmental enhancement through the planning process? What is the evidence on how environmental and biodiversity gains agreed through the planning process are realised and sustained? Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, 2022
See details