8.2k Other than providing funding, how else can the government support communities to take on heritage assets?

Background

Our nation’s heritage is irreplaceable and a vital tool for economic growth, creating diverse jobs, specialist skills, and fostering real pride in place. We want to protect and enhance the best of our heritage to meet modern needs, keeping it alive through re-use and regeneration, providing communities with the infrastructure they need, and empowering them to take on the heritage assets they cherish. DCMS needs to better understand how these goals can be achieved most effectively, whilst considering local, financial and environmental impacts of the sector and interventions.

Next steps

Get in touch with [email protected]

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Integrating Lifetimes in Heritage Capital

    ITHACA aims to articulate the economic value of caring for heritage. This project brings together an interdisciplinary team, including Associate Prof. Josep Grau-Bove (expert in damage prediction in heritage), Dr. Ricky ...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on articulating the economic value of caring for heritage assets and how prevention of change brings value to society, aligning with the question's goal of supporting communities to take on heritage assets.

  • Assembling Alternative Futures for Heritage

    Assembling Alternative Futures for Heritage (AAFH) is an interdisciplinary research programme which aims to develop a broad, international and cross-sectoral comparative framework for understanding 'heritage' in its most...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project explores alternative practices and processes of future-making involved in heritage conservation, which could partially address the question of supporting communities to take on heritage assets.

  • Co-creating heritage: bottom-up planning for heritage management in rural areas

    A Management Plan (MP), the default means to assess tangible cultural heritage resources and associated intangible values, provides a periodically revisable document describing strategic goals over the resources in quest...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: Newcastle University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on bottom-up planning for heritage management in rural areas, involving local communities in the process, which partially aligns with the question's goal of supporting communities to take on heritage assets.

  • Intangible heritage and design in historic contexts

    Intangible heritage is fast becoming a prerequisite concept for the contemporary understanding and interpretation of heritage. However, in England, a prevailing focus on tangible (physical) heritage assets within policy ...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: Manchester Metropolitan University

  • A Sustainable Future for the Historic Urban Core - SHUC

    The historic urban cores of European towns are a major European cultural asset. (J. Pendlebury, 2009; J. Pendlebury & Strange, 2011) However, their planning and management vary significantly because of different inst...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: Newcastle University

  • UEA Research for Community Heritage Ideas Bank: starting with your idea

    UEA's virtual Open Day, May & June 2012 - A Research for Community Heritage Ideas Bank: starting with your idea To explore the potential of research for community heritage we need to start with ideas. Our experience ...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of East Anglia

  • LeicSurvey: A digital survey tool for the heritage sector

    The heritage sector needs to support and measure participation in heritage-related activities to allow local/national decision-makers to understand the impact of different policies and practices. A key aim is to demonstr...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Leicester

  • Roots and Futures: Scaling-up and sustaining co-produced, placed-based heritage with marginalised communities in heritage policy and decision-making

    Roots and Futures is a collaborative partnership between community enterprises, heritage organisations and academics which has explored the place-based heritage of Sheffield's industrial heartland. Since 2020, we have be...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

  • Linking Communities to Historic Environments (LCHE)

    The Linking Communities to Historic Environments (LCHE) research review assessed the broad range of projects and approaches that state-related organisations and civil society heritage bodies apply to engaging people with...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: Historic Environment Scotland

  • Triangulation of values using different valuation methods - CAVEAT

    CAVEAT will identify and mitigate the caveats associated with current valuation methods when applied to culture and heritage capital to inform decision making. CAVEAT will explore how to best triangulate existing valuati...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Glasgow