Which peatland data gaps should be addressed as a priority?

Background

Question Group: Focused on safeguarding and enhancing Scotland’s natural resources, its air, soils, land, water, plants and wildlife, by addressing the drivers of nature loss and environmental degradation. Emphasises restoration of degraded ecosystems, sustainable use of wild species, minimising of pollution, improving the management of invasive non-native species. Targets sustainable use of resources to support thriving communities, nature, and the economy in a changing climate.

Sub-questions: -How can biodiversity responses to peatland restoration be effectively assessed across Scotland?
-What are appropriate indicators for biodiversity impacts of peatland restoration?
-How can we to quantify the range of benefits we can derive from peatlands (flooding, water quality, biodiversity etc.) to support multi-criteria targeting of management and restoration and better target investment for maximum benefit in future?
-How can we quantify the impacts of grazing (both wild and livestock) on peatlands, including carbon offtake, erosion and species composition, and the options and trade-offs to minimise these impacts?
-What data will we need to inform and improve the accuracy of an updated carbon calculator?
-How should we us new LiDAR data to understand our peatlands?
-How should we understand and quantify the land use, emissions and co-benefits associated with shallow peatlands that fall outwith the current 50 cm depth definition?

Next steps

Get in touch with [email protected]

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

Environment natural resources agriculture research strategy 2027 2032

Research fields

Related UKRI funded projects