How does upstream and in-case decision making by public authorities affect demand
and case progression within the tribunal system?

Background

The objective for MoJ is to improve the way people are supported to resolve their legal matters in a fair and efficient way, that leads to positive and sustained outcomes. This includes delivering a modern and efficient courts and tribunal service that harnesses the potential of digital innovation. We want to enhance our understanding of complex journeys through the justice system, including the interaction between civil, family and criminal justice systems.

Next steps

Get in touch with [email protected]

Related UKRI funded projects

  • Administrative Justice Network

    The proposed events aim to reenergise the debate about the administrative justice system looking forward and targeting pressing issues. The Administrative Justice System is about how government treats people - ideally it...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Westminster

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on administrative justice system and decision-making processes within tribunals, directly addressing the question.

  • Legal Pathways - Integrated Legal Workflow App

    Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls and President of the UK Civil Courts, has called for a single portal for legal issue resolution, connected to online dispute systems by Application Programming Interfaces (APIs)....

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: TABLED TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project addresses access to justice and legal support, which is related to the question but does not fully cover the impact of decision-making by public authorities.

  • Creating information transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic

    COVID-19 is significantly impacting civil society, especially with regards to the delivery of justice across the UK. It is obfuscating the principle of 'open justice' and our archaic court processes simply aren't able to...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: JUST: ACCESS LIMITED

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it focuses on information transparency in court proceedings during COVID-19, but does not directly address upstream and in-case decision making by public authorities.

  • Virtual Justice - Enhancing accessibility, participation and procedural justice in family courts and tribunals during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Perceptions of accessibility and fairness are central to civil order and the legitimacy of the legal system and state. COVID-19 and social distancing rules have forced radical changes upon the justice system with many tr...

    Funded by: COVID

    Lead research organisation: University of Oxford

  • Leveraging artificial intelligence to optimise customer data capture and processing in a post COVID-19 world

    The reduction in access to legal aid and COVID-19 has had a detrimental impact on the functioning of the UK justice system, our economy, and society at large. Consumers and businesses have seen cases suspended or delayed...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: WYSER LTD

Similar ARIs from other organisations

Whole Justice System Analysis - Justice Economics How does the efficiency of Scotland’s court system compare to similar jurisdictions in terms of case backlog and processing costs? Scottish Government Justice Analytical Services, 2025
Full details