What factors do jurors consider when evaluating the credibility of witnesses? How do jurors understand and account for common trauma responses such as freezing, befriending, anger, dissociation, lack of visible distress, and cognitive impacts on memory and coherence during their deliberations?

Background

The Scottish Government’s Vision for Justice aims to establish an effective, modern person-centred and trauma-informed approach to justice in which everyone can have trust, including as victims, those accused of crimes and as individuals in civil disputes. As such, Justice Analytical Services have identified the theme of ‘Justice Processes & Experiences’ as a research priority. Robust research on justice processes, the experiences of complainers and the accused as well as the functioning of juries will inform work towards this aim.

Next steps

Get in touch with Justice_Analysts@gov.scot

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

Justice analytical services areas research interest

Research fields

No research fields assigned yet

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Putting Cognitive Science to Work in the Legal System: An Evidence Based Approach to Testimony Evaluation and Beyond

    This programme of research will focus on using methods from law, psychology, and neuroscience to examine how the credibility, accuracy, and overall reliability of eye-witness accounts are assessed in the criminal justice...

    Funded by: UKRI FLF

    Why might this be relevant?

    This project focuses on using methods from law, psychology, and neuroscience to examine how the credibility of witnesses is assessed in the criminal justice system, which directly addresses the question.

  • Special Measures for Vulnerable Witnesses: Use, Effectiveness, and Improvement

    The use of special measures (i.e., provisions introduced by the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act, 1999) to support vulnerable witnesses giving evidence in court has recently increased dramatically. Best-practice u...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Why might this be relevant?

    This project investigates the use and effectiveness of special measures for vulnerable witnesses, which is directly related to understanding how jurors account for trauma responses and credibility of witnesses.

  • Factors impacting jurors' interpretations of criminal standards of proof

    In criminal jury trials in the English criminal justice system, the decision to convict is partly determined by the jurors' interpretation of the required standard of proof, which is 'beyond a reasonable doubt.' If the j...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Why might this be relevant?

    While this project focuses on jurors' interpretations of criminal standards of proof, it does not directly address the question about jurors' understanding and account for trauma responses and credibility of witnesses.

  • Preliminary fact-finding by judges in jury trials in England

    Fact-finding in jury trials is split between judge & jury. The judge decides many preliminary questions of fact that determine the admissibility of evidence (including whether a witness is competent to testify) and t...

    Funded by: AHRC

  • Exploring the influence of courtroom questioning and pre-trial preparation on eyewitness accuracy

    When witnesses testify in court they enter an unfamiliar world. Witness preparation courses aim to demystify the court process and claim to help witnesses develop appropriate skills that will assist them to give their be...

    Funded by: AHRC

  • Preventing improper juror conduct and ensuring effective jury deliberations

    In recent years juror use of the internet during criminal trials has resulted in numerous mistrials, causing substantial financial costs to the criminal court system and personal distress and hardship to victims and witn...

    Funded by: ESRC

  • Prosecutors' Interviews with Crown Witnesses: A Socio-Legal and Comparative Analysis

    Prosecution barristers traditionally do not speak to complainants and other prosecution witnesses in England and Wales. Fears of being accused of 'coaching' a witness to testify at trial have precluded virtually all dire...

    Funded by: AHRC

  • UK-Brazil Eyewitness Memory Network

    The aim of this project is to launch the UK-Brazil Eyewitness Memory Network, which will be formed by prominent researchers in the field of eyewitness testimony from both countries. Eyewitness testimony is crucial in var...

    Funded by: ISPF