What is needed to enable the public sector to adopt AI?

Background

In the National AI Strategy, the government made commitments to enrich our understanding of AI as it impacts the economy and society more broadly. Additionally, we recently launched a steering board chaired by the heads of both the government analysis and scientific functions, to ensure cohesive cross government approaches to understanding AI impacts. An overview of the high-level questions we are asking in this regard are outlined in the section below. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-aistrategy)

Some priority work we are currently developing to meet these commitments include:

An analysis of the AI White Paper consultation to feed into the formal consultation response. This will allow us to take on feedback from the public and various key players in sectors across the economy, and better tailor policy interventions to support strategic AI aims.

Establishing the AI Safety Institute to advance the world’s knowledge of AI safety by carefully examining, evaluating, and testing new frontier AI systems. The Institute will conduct fundamental research on how to keep people safe in the face of fast and unpredictable progress in AI, improving our understanding of the capabilities and risks of AI systems.

A monitoring and evaluation framework for AI regulatory interventions in tandem with the AI regulatory white paper. This will develop our understanding of key metrics to monitor with regards to Ai governance and ecosystem impacts.

Research into the AI sector and supply. Updating the AI Sector Study to establish a consistent and comparable set of economic indicators for the AI sector in terms of producers and suppliers. This study helps us to best understand where the AI sector needs support, to grow sovereign capability of the UK in AI, in alignment with strategic priorities.

The development of a cross-economy national AI risk register. Developed in tandem with a responsibility register that garnered cross Whitehall agreement on which departments hold which risks with regards to AI. The risk register will provide a single source of truth on AI risks which regulators, government departments, and external groups can use to prioritise further action.

Further research into Compute and the best ways to leverage compute to support the AI sector. This will be key to informing our response to the future of compute review, and maximising the £1 billion+ investments in state-of-the-art compute.

Next steps

If you are keen to register your interest in working and connecting with DSIT Digital Technology and Telecoms Group and/or submitting evidence, then please complete the DSIT-ARI Evidence survey - https://dsit.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cDfmK2OukVAnirs.
Please view full details: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-for-science-innovation-and-technology-areas-of-research-interest/dsit-areas-of-research-interest-2024

Related UKRI funded projects


  • AI UK: Creating an International Ecosystem for Responsible AI Research and Innovation

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) can have dramatic effects on industrial sectors and societies (e.g., Generative AI, facial recognition, autonomous vehicles). AI UK will pioneer a reflective, inclusive approach to responsibl...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Southampton

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on creating an international ecosystem for responsible AI research and innovation, aligning with the need for policy interventions to support strategic AI aims.

  • Seclea Platform - Responsible AI Tools for Everyone

    Artificial Intelligence has the potential to improve our lives with rapid, personalised and assistive services. It presents risks of negative effects on both society and individual citizens. Recent debacles have showed t...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: SECLEA LTD

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project aims to make AI transparent, explainable, auditable, and accountable, addressing the need to build public trust and confidence in AI decision-making processes.

  • Democratise access to AI governance through bringing responsible AI platform providers together and enabling access to SMEs

    Enzai has built a responsible AI platform which allows users to understand and manage the risks that come with AI, through policy and governance controls. The company is seeking to form a consortium in order to democrati...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: ENZAI TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on democratizing access to AI governance, which is a partial aspect of enabling the public sector to adopt AI.

  • Responsible AI for Long-term Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (RAILS): Integrating Responsible AI and Socio-legal Governance

    Society is seeing enormous growth in the development and implementation of autonomous systems, which can offer significant benefits to citizens, communities, and businesses. The potential for improvements in societal wel...

    Funded by: SPF

    Lead research organisation: University of Oxford

  • Seclea – Building Trust in AI

    Artificial Intelligence has the potential to improve our lives with rapid, personalised and assistive services. At the same time, it presents risks of negative impacts on both society and individual citizens. Recent deba...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: SECLEA

  • ENFIELD: European Lighthouse to Manifest Trustworthy and Green AI

    ENFIELD will create a unique European Centre of Excellence that excels the fundamental research in the scientific pillars of Adaptive, Green, Human-Centric, and Trustworthy AI that are new, strategic and of paramount imp...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM

  • Enabling a Responsible AI Ecosystem

    Problem Space: There is now a broad base of research in AI ethics, policy and law that can inform and guide efforts to construct a Responsible AI (R-AI) ecosystem, but three gaps must be bridged before this is achieved: ...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Edinburgh

  • GRAIL (Guide to Regulation & AI Laws) A natural language process approach to discovery of AI regulations & laws.

    AI has the potential to transform our understanding of the world and help resolve many persistent human and environmental concerns. This transformative potential has stimulated the creation of a plethora of guidelines, d...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: ORBIT RRI LIMITED

  • Multi-scale Operation-assurance evaluation Tool for AI (MOT4AI) Systems

    According to a UK government report (2019), approximately 50% of SMEs in the UK were using AI technology. The government has called for greater transparency in AI systems to ensure they are used ethically and fairly. We ...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: DIGITAL READINESS & INTELLIGENCE LTD

  • Ai Risk Management for SME ecosystem

    Until recently, the use of AI in business has been generally unregulated. However, this is rapidly changing. AI's increasing prevalence and wider consumer and legislator recognition of its role in society is driving forw...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: HOLISTIC AI LIMITED

Similar ARIs from other organisations