Quality or quantity: Does AI enable the delivery of better outputs and increased quality from firms and businesses?

Background

"In the National AI Strategy, the government made commitments to enrich our understanding of AI as it impacts the economy and society more broadly. Additionally, we recently launched a steering board chaired by the heads of both the government analysis and scientific functions, to ensure cohesive cross government approaches to understanding AI impacts. An overview of the high-level questions we are asking in this regard are outlined in the section below. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-aistrategy)

Some priority work we are currently developing to meet these commitments include:

An analysis of the AI White Paper consultation to feed into the formal consultation response. This will allow us to take on feedback from the public and various key players in sectors across the economy, and better tailor policy interventions to support strategic AI aims.

Establishing the AI Safety Institute to advance the world’s knowledge of AI safety by carefully examining, evaluating, and testing new frontier AI systems. The Institute will conduct fundamental research on how to keep people safe in the face of fast and unpredictable progress in AI, improving our understanding of the capabilities and risks of AI systems.

A monitoring and evaluation framework for AI regulatory interventions in tandem with the AI regulatory white paper. This will develop our understanding of key metrics to monitor with regards to Ai governance and ecosystem impacts.

Research into the AI sector and supply. Updating the AI Sector Study to establish a consistent and comparable set of economic indicators for the AI sector in terms of producers and suppliers. This study helps us to best understand where the AI sector needs support, to grow sovereign capability of the UK in AI, in alignment with strategic priorities.

The development of a cross-economy national AI risk register. Developed in tandem with a responsibility register that garnered cross Whitehall agreement on which departments hold which risks with regards to AI. The risk register will provide a single source of truth on AI risks which regulators, government departments, and external groups can use to prioritise further action.

Further research into Compute and the best ways to leverage compute to support the AI sector. This will be key to informing our response to the future of compute review and maximising the £1 billion+ investments in state-of-the-art compute."

Next steps

If you are keen to register your interest in working and connecting with DSIT Science, Innovation, and Research Directorate, and/or submitting evidence, then please complete the DSIT-ARI Evidence survey - https://dsit.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cDfmK2OukVAnirs

Link to ARI Document : https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-for-science-innovation-and-technology-areas-of-research-interest/dsit-areas-of-research-interest-2024

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Weaving an AI Safety Net for UK and Canada

    In response to the increasing international recognition of the harms arising from the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI)  systems and the emergent establishment of AI Safety Institutes in multiple countries,...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on establishing an AI Safety Institute to advance knowledge of AI safety, which directly relates to the question of AI enabling better outputs and quality.

  • BridgeAI - Sector Capabilities ATI Direct Award

    BridgeAI is a major new initiative at the Turing, funded by Innovate UK, that is aimed at accelerating the adoption of AI (Artificial Intelligence) technologies in sectors with high growth potential across the UK includi...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: THE ALAN TURING INSTITUTE

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it focuses on accelerating AI adoption in sectors but does not directly address the question of quality vs quantity.

  • AI^2: Assurance and Insurance for Artificial Intelligence

    AI is rapidly reshaping the way we work and live. Tailoring state-of-the-art solutions was only possible for those companies with AI research labs or individuals with deep technical knowledge of how the technology works....

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project addresses the issue of AI reliability and trust through the development of insurance services for AI solutions, which is relevant to the question of AI enabling better outputs and quality.

  • Turing AI Fellowship: Adaptive, Robust, and Resilient AI Systems for the FuturE

    The Office for Artificial Intelligence (AI) estimates that AI could add £232 billion to the UK economy by 2030, increasing productivity in some industries by 30%. However, to be truly transformational, the integrat...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: King's College London

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it focuses on creating adaptive AI systems but does not directly address the question of quality vs quantity.

  • Multi-scale Operation-assurance evaluation Tool for AI (MOT4AI) Systems

    According to a UK government report (2019), approximately 50% of SMEs in the UK were using AI technology. The government has called for greater transparency in AI systems to ensure they are used ethically and fairly. We ...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: DIGITAL READINESS & INTELLIGENCE LTD

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it aims to develop a tool for evaluating AI systems but does not directly address the question of quality vs quantity.

  • AI UK: Creating an International Ecosystem for Responsible AI Research and Innovation

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) can have dramatic effects on industrial sectors and societies (e.g., Generative AI, facial recognition, autonomous vehicles). AI UK will pioneer a reflective, inclusive approach to responsibl...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Southampton

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it focuses on creating an international ecosystem for responsible AI research and innovation, which indirectly impacts the quality and quantity of outputs from firms and businesses.

  • Scaling in Germany

    We are a Wales-based AI start-up that helps manufacturers to improve operations and increase productivity. We are developing an innovative platform that helps them to augment workers with powerful no-code AI- tools to au...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: NIGHTINGALE HQ LIMITED

  • Public value mapping for AI

    As the momentum behind AI builds, discussions about “Responsible AI” and “AI for good” are being taken increasingly seriously. We are seeing new governance structures and policy priorities. And yet we know little about c...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University College London

  • FRAIM: Framing Responsible AI Implementation and Management

    Context Increasing applications of AI technologies have necessitated rapid evolution in organisational policy and practice. However, these rapid changes have often been isolated in individual organisations and sectors, ...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially relevant as it focuses on responsible AI implementation and management, not specifically on the impact of AI on quality or quantity of outputs.

  • Turing Innovation Catalyst Manchester (TIC).

    The Turing Innovation Catalyst (Manchester) (TIC or TIC-M) aims to accelerate the commercial exploitation of productivity-enhancing Artificial Intelligence (AI) and digital trust technologies in Greater Manchester (GM). ...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER