How do staff qualifications and experience levels impact the delivery of programmes and their outcomes?
Background
We want to address the causes of reoffending using personalised evidence, live data, and digital services to better target and sequence interventions. To do this we need to build the evidence base that can inform the development of more holistic measures than ‘proven reoffending’, factoring in a broader range of outcomes.
Next steps
We can be contacted at the following email address: evidence_partnerships@justice.gov.uk.
Source
This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:
Related UKRI funded projects
-
Rehabilitating Probation: Rebuilding culture, identity and legitimacy in a reformed public service
The Probation Service plays a key role in the criminal justice system providing public protection, managing risk and supporting the rehabilitation of offenders. Probation services are responsible for supervising around 2...
Funded by: ESRC
Why might this be relevant?
The project focuses on the impact of probation service reform on staff, which is directly related to the question.
-
Devolving Probation Services: An ethnographic study of the implementation of the Transforming Rehabilitation agenda
The Probation Service in England & Wales is a public body which plays a key role in the criminal justice system. The Service is more than 100 years old and is responsible for supervising offenders subject to communit...
Funded by: ESRC
Why might this be relevant?
The project focuses on the devolution of probation services, which is not directly related to the question.
-
Plymouth Community Justice Court: A Case Study of Problem Solving Interventions, Reducing Re-offending and Public Confidence
The criminal justice system has over many years introduced a range of initiatives designed to reduce crime and support offenders in their efforts to desist from crime. One recent initiative, originating in the U.S.A and ...
Funded by: ESRC
Why might this be relevant?
The project focuses on the effectiveness of a community justice court, which is not directly related to the question.