Training – Preparing our people for operations with appropriate training can be costly. How do we harness advances in synthetics and simulation to reduce the need for real training? What technological advances will improve our ability to train and prepare for dangerous situations without exposing our people to unnecessary risks? How do we reduce our burden on the physical environment? What is the optimum blend of real/synthetic training? How do we measure the effectiveness of team and collective training?

Background

Defence spends around £8 billion annually on the provision of equipment and technological solutions for our Armed Forces. The cost of delivering and maintaining these platforms grows with technical complexity. For military platforms and weapons systems, there are significant technical challenges in driving down the cost of integration and ownership; integrating these systems into a networked environment; addressing a range of difficult targets; and providing the ability to defeat targets under highly constrained rules of engagement. This will drive the need for increased stand-off ranges of our platform and weapons systems which will require developments in our propulsion and airframe designs.

Next steps

Get in touch with [email protected]

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

20171124 MOD ARI O

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Novel Approach to Rotorcraft Simulation Fidelity Enhancement and Assessment

    The vision for this research is to develop a novel toolset for flight simulation fidelity enhancement. This represents a step-change in simulator qualification, is well-timed making a significant contribution to the UoL ...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Liverpool

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on harnessing advances in synthetics and simulation to reduce the need for real training and improve training effectiveness.

  • A Revolution in Military Learning? Uncovering the Potential of Lessons-Learned Processes

    This grant engages with conceptual, empirical and theoretical research questions about military learning processes which have the potential to substantially enhance the military effectiveness of NATO member-states in a w...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Royal Holloway University of London

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project explores military learning processes, which is related to training and preparing for dangerous situations.

  • C2 Agility and Requisite Maturity Loughborough University Participation in NATO Task Group SAS-085

    The purpose of this proposal is to fund the participation of Professor Michael Henshaw, with his expertise in systems engineering for Network Enabled Capability (NEC), in a new NATO Technical Activity Programme (TAP) on ...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Loughborough University

  • Unmanned Aerial System Integration & Test Digital Twin

    CHANGE OF SCOPE SUMMARY Thales proposes a change of scope in replacing the original UITDT use case – based on an unmanned air system integration and digital twin – with a Complex System Integration and Test Digital Twin ...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: THALES UK LIMITED

  • Lifting Standards: A Novel Approach to the Development of Fidelity Criteria for Rotorcraft Flight Simulators

    Some background to the theme of the research will hopefully set the scene. Flight simulators have become integral to the manufacturing, training and research communities and their utilisation is expanding rapidly. Howeve...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Liverpool