How do we measure performance / capability development for a risk before it materialises?

Background

The world is changing rapidly and we continue to see long-term shifts in the balance of global and military power, increasing competition between states as well as the threat from non-state actors. The challenges have become more complex and intertwined. We are inviting research organisations to consider our latest research interests in measuring and responding to security threats in a way that is evidence-led.

Next steps

Should you have questions relating to this ARI please contact co_aris@cabinetoffice.gov.uk. If your query relates to a specific question please state its title in your email.

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

CO AR Is 2019 20190429

Related UKRI funded projects

  • National Security Through Partnership: Building Bridges between Research, Policy & Practice

    The key question underpinning the "National Security through Partnership" Fellowship is: how can we promote better engagement between National Security stakeholders - policy-makers and practitioners - and acade...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Cambridge

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question by exploring and gathering ideas for new mechanisms for engagement in measuring and responding to security threats.

  • Constraints on the Design of Security Policy: Insights from Audience Costs Theory and Security and Defence Elites in the United Kingdom

    This project seeks to explain how security policy is developed in the UK, and suggest how relationships between different security and defence agencies can be improved. Security policies protect the borders of a nation-s...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question by explaining how security policy is developed and suggesting improvements in relationships between security and defence agencies.

  • Holistic framework for the MatUrity evaLuaTIon of ReAdiness level for security TEchnologies (MultiRATE)

    In the recent years, there are plenty of metrics that try to evaluate the maturity of products/sysIn the recent years, there are plenty of metrics that try to evaluate the maturity of products/systems/processes when iden...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project is relevant as it proposes a framework for evaluating readiness levels of security technologies, which could be used to measure performance/capability development for a risk before it materialises.

  • Strategic Governance of Science and Technology Pathways to Security

    For most of the 20th century warfare was understood as something that happens between nation states. Most security technology was therefore developed for conventional warfare between States, with military technologies in...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: London School of Economics and Political Science

  • Securing Against Future Events (SaFE): Pre-emption, Protocols, and Publics

    In the decade following the events of September 11 2001, security against potential terrorist attack has significantly changed in its form and emphasis. Put simply, in many of the post-event analyses following the attack...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Durham University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on measuring and responding to security threats in a way that is evidence-led, specifically addressing pre-emption and future threat events.

  • Evaluating Cyber Security Evidence for Policy Advice: The Other Human Dimension

    The quality of a state's capacity to respond to the challenges of cyber security is rapidly coming to be recognised as an important element of global competitiveness. This project seeks to understand the challenges faced...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University College London

  • 'The Drivers of Military Strategic Reform in the Face of Economic Crisis and Changing Warfare'

    The project `The Drivers of Military Strategic Reform in the Face of Economic Crisis and Changing Warfare' asks the central question 'What are the key determinants of contemporary European military forces?'. The context ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Bath

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project discusses the drivers of military strategic reform in the face of economic crisis and changing warfare, which is related to security threats but does not directly address measuring performance/capability development for a risk before it materializes.

  • Lessons Learned Project II - historical challenges to contemporary security issues

    This is a proposal for AHRC funding of a further 'Lessons Learned Project'. The intention behind the project is to bridge the gaps and create engagement between the academic sectors and the closed intelligence community....

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: King's College London

  • RBOC N+ - Resilience Beyond Observed Capabilities

    The RBOC (Resilience Beyond Observed Capabilities) Network Plus will create new knowledge, new capabilities and new opportunities for collaboration to help the UK prepare for security threats in the coming decades. The s...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Coventry University

  • Bayesian Analysis of Competing Cyber Hypotheses

    Cyber security is recognised as important at the highest levels of international government. President Obama has said that "the Cyber threat is one of the most serious economic and national security challenges [the ...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Liverpool

Similar ARIs from other organisations

The rapidly evolving operating environment Understanding implication of future technology - Our service personnel and systems will be threatened by the availability of a greater number of devices with diverse sensing modalities, weapon systems with longer range, enhanced lethality and an adversary who could deploy them in ways that exploit our vulnerabilities. Our ability to objectively assess threats from technological advances in areas such as cyber, unmanned systems and additive manufacturing, and quantify their consequences is key to our understanding of future risk. Ministry of Defence, 2018
See details
Increase our global Impact In security applications, how can we rely on AI to show us all the possible threats (not seeing what we are not shown)? Department for Transport, 2023
See details