Archived

How can we better capture the comparable value for money and non-monetised benefits of different community-led initiatives and interventions (including those which seek to strengthen social infrastructure and social capital)?

Background

Including bringing together further evidence on what the social and economic impact of having a more integrated and cohesive place is.

Next steps

The lead contacts are: Lesley Smith, Senior Principal Research Officer, Analysis, Research and Co-ordination Unit, Analysis and Data Directorate: [email protected] and David Hughes, Head of the Chief Scientific Adviser’s office: [email protected].

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

DLUHC Areas of research interest GOVUK

Related UKRI funded projects

  • The Centre for Collaboration in Community Connectedness (C4)

    There is a rich landscape of community action in the UK, but learning is uneven and partial, and we lack the evidence base and infrastructure for investment in, or scale-up of, successful approaches. The Centre for Colla...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Sheffield Hallam University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on community connectedness, social bonds, and cohesion, which directly addresses the question of capturing the comparable value for money and non-monetised benefits of community-led initiatives.

  • A review of theories, concepts and interventions relating to community-level strengths and their impact on health and well being

    This paper draws on two reviews of the relationship between strong communities and health and well being. The first is a theoretical and conceptual review of recent ideas that presuppose the existence of community relati...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: CARDIFF UNIVERSITY

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project reviews theories, concepts, and interventions relating to community-level strengths and their impact on health and well-being, which aligns with the question's focus on capturing the value and benefits of community-led initiatives.

  • Concepts and meanings of community in the social sciences: a review

    The project 'Concepts and meanings of community in the social sciences' undertook to produce a conceptual review, linking theoretical underpinnings with the usage of the concepts of community in empirical research and de...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: CARDIFF UNIVERSITY

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project reviews the concepts and meanings of community in the social sciences, but does not directly address the question's focus on capturing the value and benefits of community-led initiatives.

  • Unearth Hidden Assets through Community Co-design and Co-production

    One of the driving forces behind the Connected Communities scheme is to help communities become stronger, more resilient and self-reliant so that they can adapt and thrive even in difficult times like the economic downtu...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: Brunel University London

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project explores community co-design and co-production, which partially aligns with the question's focus on capturing the value and benefits of community-led initiatives. However, it does not directly address the non-monetised benefits and social infrastructure aspects mentioned in the question.

  • The social, historical, cultural and democratic context of civic engagement: imagining different communities and making them happen.

    Our research studies how communities connect people, both today and in the past. These connections take many forms, but often include people coming together to seek change and pursue a different future. We are interested...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Edinburgh

  • Valuing Different Perspectives - evaluation and evaluative knowledge

    A central aim of the Connected Communities programme has been to carry out research with communities, not on communities. The AHRC are now keen to understand what the legacy of this investment in research with communitie...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Stirling

  • From 'Bridging Social Capital' to 'Co-operative Social Capital'? Mapping Emergent Connectivities across Communities

    Our project consisted of a research review and a scoping study. The focus of the research review was on the place, role and significance of social capital in the Labour and Coalition Governments. We examined two 'policy ...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Southampton

  • Resilient, Mutual self-help in cities of growing diversity

    In cities of growing diversity a complex and dynamic set of variables have led to new patterns of settlement and community dynamics that pose challenges to civic engagement and call into the question the feasibility of m...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Birmingham

  • University of Brighton and The Trust for Developing Communities Limited KTP 23_24 R6

    To develop a novel, professional and commercial 'community research function' to generate insights with excluded communities and actionable recommendations for social change....

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON

  • WELLbeing & COMMunity Engagement (WELLCOMM): evidence from observational studies & impact for social prescribing

    There is strong theoretical literature on why community engagement is crucial to the survival and thrival of our species, and emerging data from intervention studies on the benefits specifically for wellbeing. But there ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON