Archived

What is the evidence on the most efficient means of securing environmental enhancement through the planning process? What is the evidence on how environmental and biodiversity gains agreed through the planning process are realised and sustained?

Background

Enhancing our understanding of the longer-term best methodologies for evaluating the impact of different interventions, and the recent experiences of reform outside of England both across the UK and internationally, to inform our own reforms.

Next steps

The lead contacts are: Lesley Smith, Senior Principal Research Officer, Analysis, Research and Co-ordination Unit, Analysis and Data Directorate: [email protected] and David Hughes, Head of the Chief Scientific Adviser’s office: [email protected].

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

DLUHC Areas of research interest GOVUK

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Injecting a Natural Capital Planning Tool into Green-Blue Infrastructure Management

    Injecting a Natural Capital Planning Tool into Green-Blue Infrastructure Management The UK Natural Environment White Paper called for better delivery and management of green-blue infrastructure (GBI). Specifically: &qu...

    Funded by: NERC

    Lead research organisation: University of Birmingham

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project aims to improve the incorporation and appreciation of GBI value and benefits within UK planning policy and decision making.

  • Planning for Nature Recovery: the role of spatial planning in preventing habitat and biodiversity loss

    What is the problem? Habitat and biodiversity loss are a global nature emergency, and urbanisation is a key driver. With the UK now one of the most nature-depleted countries in Europe, governments have recently introdu...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

    Why might this be relevant?

    This project specifically addresses the impact of nature recovery planning on habitat and biodiversity loss, providing quantitative and qualitative analysis.

  • The Nature Investment Land Assessment Tool

    The UK's natural environment was valued at a stock of £1.5 trillion in 2021, but its habitats decreased by 24% from 1990 to 2024, reflecting a pressing need for investment into nature and natural restoration. Howe...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: CITY SCIENCE CORPORATION LIMITED

    Why might this be relevant?

    While this project focuses on promoting land allocation for nature in Local Plans, it does not directly address the impact of nature recovery planning on habitat and biodiversity loss.

  • Programme Coordination Team, Landscape Decisions - Towards a new framework for using land assets

    The Strategic Priority Fund (SPF) programme 'Landscape Decisions: towards a new framework for using land assets' is delivering a new framework for land management decisions. It draws on social science, economics, natural...

    Funded by: SPF

    Lead research organisation: University of Leicester

  • A Net Gain Planning Tool (NGPT) for a Green Recovery of the Built Environment Sector

    There are growing calls and policies demanding environmental net-gain from new developments. This is because the environment is increasingly seen as a valuable and multi-functional asset that benefits people's health, we...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: WSP UK LIMITED

  • ADVANCES (ADVancing Analysis of Natural Capital in LandscapE DecisionS)

    Natural Capital is a fundamental component of an economy's stock of resources upon which human health, well-being and wealth depend. Economic growth and development are conditioned by the economy's overall capital stock ...

    Funded by: SPF

    Lead research organisation: University of East Anglia

  • PLUS Change (Planning Land Use Strategies: Meeting biodiversity, climate and social objectives in a Changing world)

    PLUS Change brings together 23 institutions from across Europe including 5 Universities, 5 research institutes, 3 stakeholder network organisations, 1 performing arts collective, and 9 practice partners representing regi...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL

  • A public dialogue project on the character, causes and consequences of ecosystem change in the UK and their implications for policy development

    This project implements a programme of public dialogue on the methods, analyses and recommendations of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment (UK NEA, 2011) and its recent follow on work (NEAFO). The UK NEA/NEAFO draws tog...

    Funded by: NERC

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

  • Nature Recovery and Regional Development

    The United Kingdom (UK) has set ambitious targets to reverse biodiversity decline and ensure that 30% of land and sea is protected for wildlife by 2030, simultaneously contributing to reaching net zero, adapting to clima...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

  • UGPplus - project 101135386

    It is now widely acknowledged that to make adequate and timely progress in the direction of biodiversity mainstreaming, three critical aspects – previously overlooked or insufficiently handled by supranational policies –...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON