BEIS has committed to ending the UK’s contribution to global warming by achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Our work towards becoming a leader in green technologies and clean energy will drive economic growth, all whilst accelerating global climate action through strong international leadership.
Get in touch with ari.comment@go-science.gov.uk
This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:
Background: The UK has legally-binding targets to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and increase the use of renewable sources of energy. There is a target of reducing 80% of GHG emissions by 2050, compared to th...
Funded by: ISCF
Lead research organisation: CARDIFF UNIVERSITY
The project specifically addresses the deployment of renewables and storage in the electricity system to reduce overall system costs, providing insights and recommendations.
This project will assess a class of systems that blend electricity generation and storage, to understand the role that they could play in future energy systems. Their ability to deliver low-carbon energy on demand, at lo...
Funded by: EPSRC
Lead research organisation: University of Nottingham
The project explores Generation Integrated Energy Storage (GIES) systems, which could potentially lower the cost of renewable energy storage and deployment, but does not directly address the question of who should bear the costs of extra flexibility needed to accommodate variable renewable generators.
It is accepted that UK energy networks face a number of unprecedented challenges in the upcoming decades. These challenges include the threat to the security of energy supply due to declining indigenous fossil fuel reser...
Funded by: EPSRC
Lead research organisation: University of Warwick
The project investigates the technical and economic issues of integrating large grid scale energy storage with the energy network, which is relevant to the question of deploying renewables and storage into the electricity system, but does not directly address the question of who should bear the costs of extra flexibility.