Prevention and support: How do children experience diversionary and supportive responses in comparison to formal justice processes, and what do they identify as most helpful in preventing further criminalisation?
Background
The Promise makes a clear commitment to reducing the over-representation of care experienced children and young people in the justice system, and ensuring that justice responses are trauma-informed, proportionate, and focused on support rather than punishment. It highlights the connections between care experience, unmet needs, and pathways into offending and criminalisation. More broadly, The Promise emphasises that children who need care and protection should not be drawn into justice processes as a result of system failure.
Prolonged exposure to stress in childhood can disrupt healthy brain development. This can manifest as emotional and conduct problems in childhood, and risk-taking and criminal behaviours in adulthood. An effective evidence base in this area would support understanding of how and why care experienced children and young people come into contact with justice systems, and the impact of different justice responses, including diversion, alternatives to prosecution, and secure care on both short- and long-term outcomes.
In addition to understanding care experienced childrens’ pathways into justice systems as accused or offenders, there is a significant evidence gap around their experiences as victims of crime. Limited evidence exists on the prevalence, visibility, and reporting of victimisation among children experiencing the ‘care system’.
Scottish Government has also published a specific Justice Analytical Services ARI. We would encourage researchers to refer to this document when considering the below questions, specifically the section ‘Crime prevention: understanding and addressing the underlying causes of crime’.
Next steps
Get in touch with [email protected]
Related UKRI funded projects
-
How do differing rates and modes of child welfare service interventions impact upon educational and criminal justice outcomes of vulnerable children?
Intervention by child welfare services (CWS) aims to reduce exposure to maltreatment, trauma, or other adverse experiences, either through improvements in family functioning or because the child is placed in care. Notwit...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield
Why might this be relevant?
Partially relevant as it focuses on child welfare service interventions impacting outcomes, but does not directly address diversionary and supportive responses in comparison to formal justice processes.
-
Socio-Emotional Characteristics in Early Childhood and Offending Behaviour in Adolescence
Approximately 80 percent of persistent offenders have their first interaction with the criminal justice system before reaching adulthood and the annual cost of late intervention is approximately £17 billion (MoJ, M...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of Essex
Why might this be relevant?
Partially relevant as it explores socio-emotional characteristics in early childhood and offending behavior in adolescence, but does not directly compare diversionary and supportive responses to formal justice processes.
-
Risks, Needs and Discrimination: Examining the Fairness of Assessment and Planning Frameworks for Youth Justice Interventions
The Fellowship aims to contribute to the developing literature on the intersections between youth deviance, parenting and institutional discrimination. Understandings of youth crime as triggered by individual and familia...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of Oxford
Why might this be relevant?
Not relevant as it focuses on discrimination in youth justice interventions and does not address diversionary and supportive responses in comparison to formal justice processes.