‘Cross-border placements’: Are children living cross-border whilst experiencing care more likely to experience multiple residential placements over time, and how does this vary by age when a child enters the ‘care system’?
Background
The Independent Care Review made clear that stability and relationships must sit at the heart of children’s care. It highlighted that children should be “actively supported to develop relationships with people in the workforce and wider community” who are able to provide consistency, listen and act with compassion. It also emphasised that unnecessary moves, disruptions in care, and changes in social workers can damage trust, wellbeing, and long‑term outcomes. Ensuring stability is therefore about both where children live and who they interact with.
Despite this, we still do not fully understand how instability such as moves between homes whilst in the care system, changes in caregivers, or frequent turnover in social workers affects outcomes for children at different ages, nor what local factors help prevent disruption. More evidence is needed to understand the implications of instability for babies, children and young people, and what kinds of support, investment, or system changes can promote secure and lasting relationships.
Helping support a child’s pathway to permanence is central to ensuring they experience stable, loving relationships and a secure sense of home, and avoid prolonged uncertainty. This requires timely, well‑informed decisions about the right long‑term care arrangement for each child. Drift and delay can both prolong a child’s pathway to permanence, and more evidence is needed around the related causes, outcomes, and successful mitigations.
Next steps
Get in touch with [email protected]
Topics
Research fields
Related UKRI funded projects
-
Care pathways and outcomes: The teenage years
Across the UK, when children enter care, they live in a range of different placements, such as foster care, kinship care (with relatives or friends), adoption or with their birth parents. However, adoptive placements are...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of Ulster
Why might this be relevant?
This project specifically focuses on care pathways and outcomes for children who entered care at a young age, including stability and placement breakdowns, which directly relates to the question about cross-border placements and multiple residential placements.
-
Looked-after children in Wales: An analysis of the backgrounds of children entering public care
The doctoral research around which my fellowship is centred explored the differences between local authorities in Wales in the rates at which they place children in out of home care, referred to as being a 'looked after'...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: CARDIFF UNIVERSITY
Why might this be relevant?
While this project focuses on looked-after children in Wales, it provides insights into social work practices and rates of children in care, which could partially address the question about cross-border placements and outcomes.
-
Comparing health outcomes for care experienced children and children in the general population in Scotland using linked administrative data
Children who are in the care of their local authority (care experienced children, CEC) are one of the most vulnerable groups of people in the society. In 2017 approximately 15,000 children in Scotland were visited by soc...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of Glasgow
Why might this be relevant?
This project focuses on comparing health outcomes for care experienced children in Scotland, which provides relevant information on the well-being of children in care, partially addressing the question about cross-border placements and outcomes.