Permanence: What are the average timescales to achieving permanence across different routes (e.g. reunification, kinship care, permanence orders, adoption), and how do these vary across Scotland?
Background
The Independent Care Review made clear that stability and relationships must sit at the heart of children’s care. It highlighted that children should be “actively supported to develop relationships with people in the workforce and wider community” who are able to provide consistency, listen and act with compassion. It also emphasised that unnecessary moves, disruptions in care, and changes in social workers can damage trust, wellbeing, and long‑term outcomes. Ensuring stability is therefore about both where children live and who they interact with.
Despite this, we still do not fully understand how instability such as moves between homes whilst in the care system, changes in caregivers, or frequent turnover in social workers affects outcomes for children at different ages, nor what local factors help prevent disruption. More evidence is needed to understand the implications of instability for babies, children and young people, and what kinds of support, investment, or system changes can promote secure and lasting relationships.
Helping support a child’s pathway to permanence is central to ensuring they experience stable, loving relationships and a secure sense of home, and avoid prolonged uncertainty. This requires timely, well‑informed decisions about the right long‑term care arrangement for each child. Drift and delay can both prolong a child’s pathway to permanence, and more evidence is needed around the related causes, outcomes, and successful mitigations.
Next steps
Get in touch with [email protected]
Research fields
Related UKRI funded projects
-
Care pathways and outcomes: The teenage years
Across the UK, when children enter care, they live in a range of different placements, such as foster care, kinship care (with relatives or friends), adoption or with their birth parents. However, adoptive placements are...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of Ulster
Why might this be relevant?
This project specifically focuses on care pathways and outcomes, including stability and placement breakdowns, which directly relate to achieving permanence for children in care.
-
The role of foster carers in meeting children's developmental and identity needs in England, Portugal and Spain
The number of children who are removed from their birth families for reasons such as neglect and/or abuse and are placed in care has been increasing over the years. Foster care is the widely preferred type of placement f...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of East Anglia
Why might this be relevant?
While the project focuses on foster care and identity needs, it does not directly address permanence across different routes as requested in the question.
-
Comparing health outcomes for care experienced children and children in the general population in Scotland using linked administrative data
Children who are in the care of their local authority (care experienced children, CEC) are one of the most vulnerable groups of people in the society. In 2017 approximately 15,000 children in Scotland were visited by soc...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: University of Glasgow
Why might this be relevant?
This project compares health outcomes for care experienced children, which is related to the broader issue of permanence and stability in care.