To what extent do therapeutic treatment models for sexual offenders, particularly methods not traditionally used in a forensic setting (e.g. mindfulness, compassion, sensate focus, and distress tolerance), reduce risk and increase likelihood of desistance from further offending? Does the effectiveness of these models vary among different cohorts of sexual offender?

Background

The Scottish Government’s Vision for Justice aims to support rehabilitation, use custody only where there is no alternative and work to reduce reoffending and revictimisation. It also aims to establish an effective, modern person-centred and trauma-informed approach to justice in which everyone can have trust, including as victims, those accused of crimes and as individuals in civil disputes. As such, Justice Analytical Services have identified the theme of ‘Sentencing Prisons & Rehabilitation’ as a research priority. Robust research on offenders, their rehabilitation and sentencing patterns will inform work towards these aims.

Next steps

Get in touch with Justice_Analysts@gov.scot

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

Justice analytical services areas research interest

Research fields

No research fields assigned yet