How best is land value captured to pay for social housing and infrastructure? What are the limits to the capture of land value, and why?
Background
MHCLG is committed to delivering 1.5 million net additional homes during this parliament. Some of our research interests include:
Next steps
Get in touch with ari-contact@communities.gov.uk
Source
This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:
Topics
Related UKRI funded projects
-
Ideology, housing and land value capture: Uncovering the politics of development land value
Research Context We are living through an era marked by crises through which dominant ideas are being challenged. The climate crisis, the Covid-19 crisis, the ongoing effects of the Global Financial Crisis, the housing ...
Funded by: ESRC
Why might this be relevant?
This project directly addresses the question by exploring the politics of land value capture and betterment policy.
-
Understanding polyrationalities of space, actors, and policies on suburban densification (SUBDENSE)
More and more people move to cities, urban areas become denser, space more scarce. As a consequence, house prices increase, leading to gentrification and displacement in city centres. At the same tim e, there is untapped...
Funded by: ESRC
Why might this be relevant?
Partially relevant as it focuses on suburban densification rather than capturing land value for social housing and infrastructure.
-
The homes and communities investment evidence collaboration
The aim of the homes and communities investment evidence collaboration is to embed up to date and authoritative research in the HCA's investment decision-making. The HCA was established in 2008 as the national housing an...
Funded by: ESRC
Why might this be relevant?
Partially relevant as it focuses on embedding research in investment decision-making for affordable housing and regeneration, but not specifically on capturing land value for social housing and infrastructure.