What is the most effective method for incentivising responsible technology design, in terms of cyber security? What are the barriers or blockers for using secure by design principles for cyber security of emerging connected technologies? Where have we seen successes in adopting secure by design principles for connected technologies? Is there a gold-standard or case study where security of a product has been considered during early inception? Has led to greater security of the product and fewer breaches?

Background

In order to ensure the UK is well protected now and in the future we need to build upon our existing knowledge of cyber security risks and the resilience of software supply chains and are working to identify which mitigations the government can leverage to ensure the UK is well protected now and in the future.

We’re also assessing the impact of these mitigations in driving enhanced security measures. A key area of research interest therefore is understanding the consequences of requiring higher levels of cybersecurity for products and digital services sold in the UK. Strengthening this evidence base will help shape and inform future policy work around the regulation of products and business requirements for cyber security.
Some technologies are critical to cyberspace. To build and sustain competitive edge in cyber-related technologies we need a coordinated, rigorous and consistent approach to identify and analyse critical areas of science and technology and prioritise national effort. CSDI is interested inbeing able to better anticipate the science and technology developments most vital to UK cyber power and in analysing thebe opportunities and risks related to those developments.

It is crucial to ensure that digital identity solutions are both secure and inclusive. The directorate seeks to gather further evidence on how best to enable more inclusive digital identity services whilst maintaining robust security measures. Digital identity solutions enable a person to prove something about themselves for the purposes of a transaction, an eligibility check or accessing services. This includes verifying a person’s age when purchasing age regulated products, when undertaking pre-employment checks or opening a bank account. The government is not mandating specific approach, but instead has committed to setting outcomes-based standards in the form of the UK digital identity & attributes trust framework. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-frameworkbeta-version/uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework-beta-version)
Organisations that adhere to these standards and agree to oversight from the Office for Digital Identities and Attributes (OfDIA) will receive a trust mark, so that businesses and individuals can be confident that their digital identity solution is safe and secure.

Next steps

If you are keen to register your interest in working and connecting with DSIT Digital Technology and Telecoms Group and/or submitting evidence, then please complete the DSIT-ARI Evidence survey - https://dsit.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cDfmK2OukVAnirs.
Please view full details: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-for-science-innovation-and-technology-areas-of-research-interest/dsit-areas-of-research-interest-2024

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

DSIT Areas of Research Interest 2024 GOV UK

Related UKRI funded projects


  • DiScriBe: Digital Security by Design Social Science Hub+

    Technological advances have done, and will do, much to improve cybersecurity. But, a technological approach is only part of the solution - achieving digital security is inherently a socio-technical endeavour. By combinin...

    Funded by: ISCF

    Lead research organisation: University of Bath

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on digital security by design and addresses the challenges and barriers in incentivizing responsible technology design for cyber security.

  • Research Institute in Science of Cyber Security (RISCS) Phase 2

    The Digital Economy is a key part of the strategy for UK economic growth. But as more businesses move into the digital space, they need to be able to protect their assets (such as their Intellectual Property) and process...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University College London

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project addresses cyber security research and the impact of security measures, but does not specifically focus on incentivizing responsible technology design.

  • Academic Centre of Excellence in Cyber Security Research - Newcastle University

    The Newcastle Academic Centre of Excellence in Cyber Security Research pursues the research vision "Protecting Society's Fabric." Following the conviction that cyber security does not arise from protecting crit...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Newcastle University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on cyber security research and the human dimensions of cyber security, but does not specifically address incentivizing responsible technology design.

  • Cyber Security Cartographies: CySeCa

    "The growth of the internet has been the biggest social and technological change of my lifetime [...] It will have a huge role to play in supporting sustainable development in poorer countries. At the same time our ...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Royal Holloway University of London

  • Academic Centre of Excellence in Cyber Security Research - Newcastle University

    Following the insight that cyber security does not only come from protecting critical infrastructures, the Centre for Cybercrime and Computer Security at Newcastle University (referred to as Cybercrime Centre in what fol...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Newcastle University

  • Centre for Secure Information Technologies (CSIT) - Phase 3

    Cyber-attacks such as those recently perpetrated on Solarwinds, Colonial Pipeline and Viasat are scaling at an alarming rate. Resilient cyber security technologies are vital to ensure that society can safely and confiden...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Queen's University Belfast

  • Games and Abstraction: The Science of Cyber Security

    This proposal addresses the challenge "How do we make better security decisions?". Specifically we propose to develop new approaches to decision support based on mathematical game theory. Our work will support ...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Imperial College London

  • Choice Architecture for Information Security

    Information security decisions are often made without any formal or rigorous backing. For instance, data about impact or likelihood of security breaches is rarely available. Careful prediction, for instance using monte c...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Newcastle University

    Why might this be relevant?

    Partially addresses the question by discussing decision-making in information security, but does not specifically focus on incentivizing responsible technology design or secure by design principles.

  • Return On Cyber Security Investment (ROCSI)

    To be of business value, any investment must be selective and focus on high priority areas of the business. However, boards find it difficult to justify the cost of investment and formulate ROI arguments on cyber securit...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Queen Mary University of London

  • Leveraging the Multi-Stakeholder Nature of Cyber Security

    Cyber Security (CyS) is a challenging, distributed, multi-stakeholder problem. It is distributed in the sense that the expertise to comprehensively assess the level of security of a given IT system is commonly not all av...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Nottingham

Similar ARIs from other organisations