Financial sustainability of research: What impact would various changes to the long-standing approaches to research funding have on research sustainability?

Background

SRID evidence aims to ensure that DSIT’s significant RDI budget is invested effectively and that we understand its impact and value for money. The Science, Technology and Innovation Analysis Team (STIA), the analytical team supporting SRID, develop the evidence base via internal analysis, cross-Whitehall collaboration and externally commissioned research projects. STIA work closely with other analytical teams in DSIT and DSIT’s partner organisations.

STIA continuously work to improve our approach and methods of valuing RDI investment to fully showcase and evidence its value to the UK. We are also interested in developing new real-time performance monitoring tools to allow for more agile decision-making and significantly improve our Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) capabilities. Improving our methodology for measuring economic, social and research benefits of RDI is also our priority.

SRID and STIA want to develop a stronger evidence base of the foundations of the Research Development and Innovation (RDI) system including how to: 1) grow the RDI workforce by improving the domestic pipeline, attracting and retaining the most talented RDI workers and supporting diverse, dynamic and creative careers 2) develop strong and sustainable RDI institutions that foster innovation 3) identify and capitalise on RDI clusters in the UK to support the levelling up agenda.
We also aim to develop a better understanding of how RDI policy can best drive economic growth, better jobs and discoveries. We aim to do this through identifying the best methods for measuring adoption and diffusion of innovation as well as drivers and barriers to innovation to create conditions for an increased investment in innovation.

Building understanding of the varied institutions within the UK RDI system and the factors affecting the operation of these institutions, such as bureaucracy and financial sustainability, is key to ensuring effectiveness of the system.

Next steps

If you are keen to register your interest in working and connecting with DSIT Science, Innovation, and Research Directorate, and/or submitting evidence, then please complete the DSIT-ARI Evidence survey - https://dsit.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cDfmK2OukVAnirs

Link to ARIs : https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-for-science-innovation-and-technology-areas-of-research-interest/dsit-areas-of-research-interest-2024

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Serendipity in Science, Technology and Innovation

    I present the Serendipity proposal, with SPRU (Sussex, UK) and Columbia (NYC, USA), to conduct a body of frontier work on the role, management and impact of serendipity on research performance. The project addresses majo...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sussex

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project directly addresses the impact of research funding changes on research sustainability, showcasing the value of serendipity in research.

  • Innovation & Research Caucus

    The ambition of the Innovation and Research Caucus (I&RC) is to establish itself as the go to intermediary for actionable innovation and research funding policy insights. Building on the legacy of the current Innovat...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Oxford Brookes University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on actionable insights for innovation and research funding policy, which could partially address the impact of changes on research sustainability.

  • Understanding the relative valuations of research impact: Applying best-worst scaling experiments to survey the public & biomedical/health researchers

    Research Councils "encourage researchers to consider the potential contribution that their research can make to the economy and society from the outset, and the resources required to carry out appropriate and projec...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: King's College London

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project aims to understand the valuations of research impact, which could partially inform the impact of changes on research sustainability.

  • Novel method for tracking the translation processes that lead to impact from Biomedical research - A pilot study

    The MRC Economic Impact call states that "The MRC wishes to understand better the link between research and wider economic and societal impacts, and to use this understanding to improve strategies for the future sup...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sussex

  • Investigation of the impact of co-location: economies of scope and scale in biomedical and health research

    It is important to achieve the best outcomes from public sector investments in medical research. To do this, research funders need to understand where they should invest the limited funds they have available to maximise ...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: RAND Europe

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project directly addresses the impact of changes to research funding on research sustainability, focusing on economies of scope and scale in biomedical research.

  • Capital investment to benefit Early Career Researchers

    The University of York operates globally, aiming to be among the best universities in the world. It aims to provide an environment that attracts and retains the very best researchers, internationally, to encourage and fa...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of York

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially addresses the question by focusing on capital investment for Early Career Researchers, which is related to research sustainability but not directly addressing changes to research funding.

  • Science and technology in the service of the State: Understanding mission-oriented research systems in a changing world

    Mission-oriented science and technology - that is Government funded science and technology in direct support of the goals or missions of the state - has a long history and accounts for a great deal of public spending on ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Manchester

  • Grant Balances 2010 - University of Loughborough

    EPSRC funds will be used for the following strategic purposes: firstly, to enable Loughborough University researchers to undertake a small number of pilot research projects (up to 5) in engineering, mathematics, ICT or s...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Loughborough University

  • Better measurement of the complementarity between UK public, charity and private medical research

    Getting benefits from medical research in terms of preventing or treating illness, advancing scientific knowledge and generating economic wealth often, though not always, involves private industry. The private sector bui...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: King's College London

  • How to embed and sustain project-initiated improvements in research capacity: good practice recommendations

    The UK government is committed to helping developing countries create their own solutions to the challenges they face rather than trying to adopt potentially inappropriate solutions from elsewhere. If developing countrie...

    Funded by: GCRF

    Lead research organisation: Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

Similar ARIs from other organisations