Misuse of statistics: What makes a statistic or data vulnerable to misuse, in what contexts is this more likely (including who is most susceptible to this and why), and how is this best addressed? What are the impacts when statistics or data are misused, how does misinformation propagate? How can public confidence in statistics or data be maintained in the face of misuse?


When a statistics producer releases a statistic or other data, it does not exist in a vacuum. People may access the statistic, try to understand its insights, use it, form judgements based on what they have learnt, and ultimately make decisions and take certain actions. Statistics are central to public debate – in the media and in policy decisions. Consequently, how a statistic is accessed and used is as important as its production for determining whether it serves the public good.

OSR has already commissioned some research into how statistics are understood by the public, such as Jessica McMaster’s review on statistical literacy. However, we want to further enrich our understanding of consumption of statistics, including how statistics are used by individuals and organisations. We have greater knowledge in some areas, for example we have a programme of work on Analytical Leadership in government which (in part) seeks to uphold the integrity of analytical evidence and support robust evidence in policy development, but we are seeking a wider and more detailed picture of the role of evidence in decision-making by a range of users.

A deeper understanding of the role of statistics in public debate better enables its protection and promotion. However, as a regulator we must also understand the threats to the role of statistics. Whilst we have investigated misinformation, and we intervene directly in instances of misuse, this is a fast-changing environment and additional research is always welcome.

Next steps

If you would like to share evidence or collaborate with us on any of these areas, please contact us at research.function@statistics.gov.uk.


This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

Used Office for Statistics Regulations Areas of Research Interest Office for Statistics Regulation

Related UKRI funded projects

  • Understanding data, understanding society: using quantitative narratives to embed evidence, argument and data within the undergraduate curriculum

    Repeated reports by the ESRC have pointed to the shortage of social science undergraduate students with even basic quantitative methods skills. This is a situation that is harmful to the on-going viability and vitality o...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Bristol

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question by providing a cross-disciplinary social sciences curriculum that uses quantitative narratives to teach the principles and concepts of quantitative methods. The authors have the necessary expertise in curriculum innovation for quantitative methods teaching.

  • Understanding Society Through Secondary Data Analysis: Quantitative Methods over the Undergraduate Life Course

    In the UK we have several large and complex datasets that reveal a lot of information about the characteristics of the general population. One of the main ESRC investments is a new study called "Understanding Societ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Lincoln

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question by creating new versions of the 'Understanding Society' dataset that are accessible to undergraduate students and developing new teaching resources for students to work through. The authors have the necessary expertise in quantitative methods and data analysis.

  • Informing Healthy Public Policy

    Public health decision makers and the public are exposed to a wide range of research evidence, that can often conflict or be uncertain. The way this evidence is presented, in scientific journals, political debates and in...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Glasgow

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question by exploring how information about health is communicated and investigating ways to improve the reliability and usefulness of research evidence in policy debates. The authors have the necessary expertise in public health and research communication.

  • A Risky Business? The Politics of Knowledge Transfer in Public Health

    Against a backdrop of increasing commitments to evidence-informed public health, a wealth of studies explore how evidence is used in public-health decision-making, some of which have informed emerging guidelines for incr...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Edinburgh

Similar ARIs from other organisations