Intersectionality: How do multiple sources of disadvantage combine and reinforce over an individual’s time within the justice system? How does intersectionality affect individual experiences and outcomes?

Background

The overarching themes that structure this ARI are closely linked, with several questions and issues that cut across them. Some extend beyond MoJ and reflect the interests of other government departments. We want to encourage research that is tangential across multiple objectives and outcomes to develop a holistic approach to analysis that supports policy and operational decision-making. This section outlines cross-cutting themes and approaches that can be considered across our research priorities.

Next steps

We can be contacted at the following email address: evidence_partnerships@justice.gov.uk.

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

Areas of research interest

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Cumulative Disadvantage in the Criminal Justice System

    Criminal justice punishment is unequally distributed. The UK has the highest rates of imprisonment in Western Europe, where ethnic minority people in prisons make up 27 per cent of prisoners compared to 13 per cent of th...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Plymouth University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project specifically focuses on cumulative disadvantage in the criminal justice system and how it affects ethnic disparities, aligning with the intersectionality aspect of the question.

  • Refining and embedding the Intersectional "MAIHDA" approach to intersectionality in quantitative social science research.

    There are big inequalities in our society, in a range of different things. Regarding health, we know that, in the UK, white people are generally more healthy than non-white people, and rich people are more healthy than p...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on intersectionality and how different characteristics combine to create advantages or disadvantages, but it does not specifically address the justice system.

  • An investigation into racial bias in court case outcomes in England and Wales

    Black Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) citizens in England and Wales are overrepresented at almost every stage within the criminal justice system, this is particularly so for black citizens. The primary aim of the propo...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project investigates racial bias in court case outcomes and aims to increase understanding of racial disparities within the criminal justice system, which directly relates to the question on how intersectionality affects individual experiences and outcomes.

  • Disentangling involvement in and the impact of integrated health and criminal justice systems: A North of England Research Consortium

    What is the problem? England and Wales (E&W) has one of the highest rates of imprisonment worldwide, with re-offending estimated to cost the economy £18.1bn every year. People who are involved in the criminal j...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Newcastle University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project explores health and care inequalities within the criminal justice system, but does not fully address how intersectionality affects individual experiences and outcomes within the system.

  • Ethnic Inequalities in the Criminal Justice System

    Ethnic inequalities in the Criminal Justice System (CJS) are well-documented and widespread. The 2017 Lammy Review, commissioned by two UK governments, presented evidence of stark ethnic disparities at all stages of the ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Manchester Metropolitan University

  • Critical Diversities@ the Intersection: Policies, Practices, Perspectives

    The overall aim of the Critical Diversities@ the Intersection: Policies, Practices, Perspectives seminar series is to: Stimulate discussion and critical thinking around the construction, debates and enduring divisions ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: London South Bank University

  • Understanding the Intersections between Care Experience and Ethnicity in Criminal Justice Involvement

    Currently, the government does not know how many of its looked after children (for example, children who have lived in foster care or children's homes) become involved with the youth justice system, or how many of those ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Manchester Metropolitan University

  • Credible Witnesses: Young People, Life Performance and Testimonial Injustice

    Credible Witnesses develops an interdisciplinary inquiry that examines how performance can be used to better understand and expose young people's experiences of testimonial injustice and improve the support they receive ...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: Royal Central School of Speech and Drama

  • Runnymede Academic Fora: End Racism This Generation.

    The Runnymede Academic Forum has been established since 2005, as a space for knowledge exchange and collaboration between academics working on issues of race equality. The Forum forms part of the work of the Runnymede Tr...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Manchester

  • The Youth Justice System's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications and impacts for policy, practice and justice-involved children

    During and after the COVID-19 pandemic, there will be societal implications for all children. However, for those in the youth justice system the impacts are likely to be exceptional. A disproportionate number of these ch...

    Funded by: COVID

    Lead research organisation: Manchester Metropolitan University

Similar ARIs from other organisations