How effective are rehabilitation activity requirements (RARs) and in what ways can they be improved?

Background

We want to address the causes of reoffending using personalised evidence, live data, and digital services to better target and sequence interventions. To do this we need to build the evidence base that can inform the development of more holistic measures than ‘proven reoffending’, factoring in a broader range of outcomes.

Next steps

We can be contacted at the following email address: evidence_partnerships@justice.gov.uk.

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

Areas of research interest

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Evaluating the long-term impact of Release on Temporary License (ROTL)

    Release on temporary licence (ROTL) provides eligible people currently in prison the opportunity to prepare for resettlement in the community through day or overnight release. The intended impact of ROTL is to reduce reo...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Queen Mary University of London

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project evaluates the long-term impact of Release on Temporary License (ROTL) and explores how changes in ROTL policy may have influenced reoffending in the long-term.

  • Enforced alcohol abstinence: does it reduce reoffending?

    Whilst there has been intense focus on illicit drugs and associated violence in crime policy in recent years, alcohol is used to a greater degree and implicated in many more crimes, especially those of violence. Courts a...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Liverpool

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project addresses the effectiveness of enforced alcohol abstinence in reducing reoffending, but does not specifically evaluate rehabilitation activity requirements (RARs).

Similar ARIs from other organisations