How can we define and measure procedural justice and (subjective) fairness? How does this vary by jurisdiction, and protected characteristics?
Background
We want to modernise the procedures and infrastructure of our courts and tribunals, leading an effective, efficient and coordinated justice system across all the civil, criminal and family justice jurisdictions.
Next steps
We can be contacted at the following email address: [email protected].
Source
This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:
Related UKRI funded projects
-
Everyday Challenges to the Rule of Law: The Case of Civil/Criminal Procedural Hybrids
Rules of legal procedure determine the steps to be taken and standards to be met in the resolution of issues coming before the law. Due to their different purposes - criminal law being to punish, civil law to compensate ...
Funded by: AHRC
Lead research organisation: University of Leeds
Why might this be relevant?
The project addresses the question fully and the authors have the necessary expertise.
-
Administrative Justice Network
The proposed events aim to reenergise the debate about the administrative justice system looking forward and targeting pressing issues. The Administrative Justice System is about how government treats people - ideally it...
Funded by: AHRC
Lead research organisation: University of Westminster
-
Creating information transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic
COVID-19 is significantly impacting civil society, especially with regards to the delivery of justice across the UK. It is obfuscating the principle of 'open justice' and our archaic court processes simply aren't able to...
Funded by: Innovate UK
Lead research organisation: JUST: ACCESS LIMITED
Why might this be relevant?
The project addresses the need for information transparency in court processes and proposes a solution using technology to improve accessibility and transparency.