How can we measure the quality of case outcomes across different jurisdictions, types of cases, and for the individuals and organisations involved? Including whether the court or tribunal was the ‘right’ method of resolution.
Background
We want to modernise the procedures and infrastructure of our courts and tribunals, leading an effective, efficient and coordinated justice system across all the civil, criminal and family justice jurisdictions.
Next steps
We can be contacted at the following email address: [email protected].
Source
This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:
Related UKRI funded projects
-
Administrative Justice Network
The proposed events aim to reenergise the debate about the administrative justice system looking forward and targeting pressing issues. The Administrative Justice System is about how government treats people - ideally it...
Funded by: AHRC
Lead research organisation: University of Westminster
Why might this be relevant?
The project partially answers the question as it aims to reenergize the debate about the administrative justice system and explore current topics such as tribunal reform and administrative decision-making. The authors have the necessary expertise to competently answer the question.
-
Creating information transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic
COVID-19 is significantly impacting civil society, especially with regards to the delivery of justice across the UK. It is obfuscating the principle of 'open justice' and our archaic court processes simply aren't able to...
Funded by: Innovate UK
Lead research organisation: JUST: ACCESS LIMITED
Why might this be relevant?
Partially relevant as it addresses the need for information transparency in court proceedings, but does not specifically address measuring the quality of case outcomes.