How can we measure the quality of case outcomes across different jurisdictions, types of cases, and for the individuals and organisations involved? Including whether the court or tribunal was the ‘right’ method of resolution.

Background

We want to modernise the procedures and infrastructure of our courts and tribunals, leading an effective, efficient and coordinated justice system across all the civil, criminal and family justice jurisdictions.

Next steps

We can be contacted at the following email address: evidence_partnerships@justice.gov.uk.

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

Areas of research interest

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Criminal Cases Review Commission: Legal Aid and Legal Representatives

    Since 1997 the CCRC has been the only independent reviewer of potential miscarriages of justice. It is an institution of crucial importance in the criminal justice process, as it acts to scrutinise the decisions, and dec...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sussex

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question as it examines the impact of legal aid cuts on applications made to the CCRC, which influences the way that the institutions of criminal justice operate and, therefore, influences the interests of civil society. The authors have the necessary expertise to competently answer the question.

  • Administrative Justice Network

    The proposed events aim to reenergise the debate about the administrative justice system looking forward and targeting pressing issues. The Administrative Justice System is about how government treats people - ideally it...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Westminster

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question as it aims to reenergize the debate about the administrative justice system and explore current topics such as tribunal reform and administrative decision-making. The authors have the necessary expertise to competently answer the question.

  • Creating information transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic

    COVID-19 is significantly impacting civil society, especially with regards to the delivery of justice across the UK. It is obfuscating the principle of 'open justice' and our archaic court processes simply aren't able to...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: JUST: ACCESS LIMITED

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question as it addresses the need for information transparency in court processes, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors have the necessary expertise to competently answer the question.