How can we better meet the needs of those with legal issues to resolve in either the civil or family justice system and the criminal justice system concurrently, for example, domestic abuse victims, victims of fraud, or defendants facing eviction?

Background

We want to improve the way people are supported in their interactions with the justice system, to target timely and efficient resolutions that lead to positive and sustainable outcomes for all parties involved.

Next steps

We can be contacted at the following email address: evidence_partnerships@justice.gov.uk.

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

Areas of research interest

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Nottingham Trent University ADR UK Data First Phase 2

    The most vulnerable people in our society have complex and multiple needs. They are likely to interact with a range of public services, from health and social care; housing and welfare; to the justice system. Whilst the ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Nottingham Trent University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on improving outcomes in the justice system and has expertise in using data to enhance evidence for policy and practice.

  • Language of DIY Justice: Communication practices & processes

    The project explores the language of DIY Justice by focusing on communication as an inherent part of court hearings as well as court processes and procedures. Since cuts to legal aid in 2013, an increasingly high number ...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: Birmingham City University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project explores communication practices and processes in the justice system, which is relevant to improving interactions with the justice system.

  • Development of an enhanced communications feature to protect vulnerable individuals within Family Law

    I co-founded transparently four years ago, as a result of my own experiences and after identifying a 'gap' in the legal services market. An opportunity to 'make it better'; to use technology to protect vulnerable individ...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: TRANSPARENTLY LIMITED

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on enhancing communications features in family law, which is partially relevant to improving interactions with the justice system.

  • Legal Pathways - Integrated Legal Workflow App

    Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls and President of the UK Civil Courts, has called for a single portal for legal issue resolution, connected to online dispute systems by Application Programming Interfaces (APIs)....

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: TABLED TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

  • Virtual Justice - Enhancing accessibility, participation and procedural justice in family courts and tribunals during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Perceptions of accessibility and fairness are central to civil order and the legitimacy of the legal system and state. COVID-19 and social distancing rules have forced radical changes upon the justice system with many tr...

    Funded by: COVID

    Lead research organisation: University of Oxford

  • Plymouth Community Justice Court: A Case Study of Problem Solving Interventions, Reducing Re-offending and Public Confidence

    The criminal justice system has over many years introduced a range of initiatives designed to reduce crime and support offenders in their efforts to desist from crime. One recent initiative, originating in the U.S.A and ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Plymouth University

  • MoJ/ADR UK Data First Programme Academic Lead

    The Data First programme is a Ministry of Justice (MoJ)-led investment funded by Administrative Data Research UK (ADR UK), part of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). This is a ground-breaking and pioneering...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Nottingham Trent University

  • Criminal Cases Review Commission: Legal Aid and Legal Representatives

    Since 1997 the CCRC has been the only independent reviewer of potential miscarriages of justice. It is an institution of crucial importance in the criminal justice process, as it acts to scrutinise the decisions, and dec...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sussex

    Why might this be relevant?

    This project specifically focuses on the impact of legal aid cuts on applications made to the CCRC, which directly relates to improving support for individuals with legal issues in the criminal justice system.

  • Domestic Abuse Proceedings In Family Courts: Overlap And Pathways In Private And Public Family Justice

    Domestic abuse proceedings in family courts are not studied at national level in England and Wales beyond basic national statistics. Until recently, research access to national family justice data has been restricted to ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Bristol

    Why might this be relevant?

    This project explores domestic abuse proceedings in family courts, providing insights into how families navigate the justice system, which is relevant to improving support for victims of domestic abuse with legal issues.

  • Exploration of the technical requirements to enable multiple legal-service-delivery-models in family law

    The way people access family-law services has changed for good; * The removal of legal aid for many cases has led to an increase in Litigants-in-Person (81% of family court cases now involve at least one person who repr...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: TRANSPARENTLY LIMITED

Similar ARIs from other organisations