Archived

Metrics for the quality of research and relative quality comparisons between international research collaboration and domestic.

Background

Core to the FCO’s work is preparing for and responding to new and sometimes unexpected natural and political events whether opportunity or crisis. Research findings on current and emerging trends to improve future forecasting, or metrics to evaluate the success or otherwise of interventions, would be of interest.

Next steps

Research enquiries should be submitted to email: fcocorrespondence@fco.gov.uk

Science and Innovation Network enquiries may be addressed to the general mailbox: ScienceandInnovationEnquires@fco.gsi.gov.uk or to individual SIN teams overseas at the addresses listed at https://www.gov.uk/world/organisations/uk-science-and-innovation-network

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

FCO Areas of Research Interest 2017 2018

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Novel method for tracking the translation processes that lead to impact from Biomedical research - A pilot study

    The MRC Economic Impact call states that "The MRC wishes to understand better the link between research and wider economic and societal impacts, and to use this understanding to improve strategies for the future sup...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sussex

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project directly addresses the question by developing and testing a new approach for evaluating biomedical research teams and understanding how research processes can be improved to enhance impact.

  • Understanding the relative valuations of research impact: Applying best-worst scaling experiments to survey the public & biomedical/health researchers

    Research Councils "encourage researchers to consider the potential contribution that their research can make to the economy and society from the outset, and the resources required to carry out appropriate and projec...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: King's College London

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project aims to understand the relative valuations of research impact by surveying the general population and biomedical/health researchers, directly addressing the question.

  • How to embed and sustain project-initiated improvements in research capacity: good practice recommendations

    The UK government is committed to helping developing countries create their own solutions to the challenges they face rather than trying to adopt potentially inappropriate solutions from elsewhere. If developing countrie...

    Funded by: GCRF

    Lead research organisation: Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on embedding and sustaining project-initiated improvements in research capacity, which is partially relevant to the question of evaluating the quality of research and relative quality comparisons between international research collaboration and domestic.

  • Science Advice for Policy by European Academies

    The project 'Science Advice for Policy by European Academies' (SAPEA) is part of the Scientific Advice Mechanism of the European Commission. At the request of the EC, it providestargeted scientific evidence in a timely a...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: THE ACADEMIA EUROPAEA (THE ACADEMY OF EUROPE)

  • Cross-disciplinary research for Discovery Science - University of Bristol

    NERC's ambitions for positive environmental impact, and for transformations in research culture are deep-rooted in the University of Bristol (UoB). UoB will shortly launch a refreshed strategy and vision, which will incl...

    Funded by: NERC

    Lead research organisation: University of Bristol

  • OSIRIS

    Embedding reproducibility in the strategy and design of research should be regarded as a key precondition to research quality. Unfortunately, only a fraction of published studies can be reproduced due to e.g, science’s n...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD

  • IRISE: Improving Reproducibility In SciencE

    Structured understanding of the drivers of irreproducibility and presenting concrete solutions of tools and interventions will help to increase the quality, reliability and re-usability of scientific evidence. To this en...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH

  • Global - The Bristol Global Engagement Network

    The University of Bristol is an international powerhouse of learning, discovery and enterprise. Its vision is of a university whose excellence is acknowledged locally, nationally and globally. International collaboration...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Bristol

  • Categorisation of citations to trace the translation and impact of biomedical research

    The importance of assessing the wider impact of biomedical research in terms of improved health is increasingly being recognised by research funding bodies. Such studies are used to account to tax payers for the money sp...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: Brunel University London

  • OPUS - Open Universal Science

    The Open and Universal Science (OPUS) project will develop coordination and support measures to reform the assessment of research and researchers at Research Performing Organisations(RPOs) and Research Funding Organisati...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: CAREERS RESEARCH AND ADVISORY CENTRE (CRAC) LIMITED(THE)

Similar ARIs from other organisations