Archived

What will future international scientific collaboration look like in a post-coronavirus world? Will scientists collaborate in a different way

Background

Our remit is global and our interests correspondingly wide. The below are indicative rather than fully comprehensive questions of relevance for our work and are arranged into ten overlapping categories.

The dynamic nature of world events and diplomatic work around them mean that we often need research based insights to help anticipate, shape, manage and benefit from unfolding developments and possible futures. The synthesised expertise of researchers can help us make judgements in a policy environment where experimental trials and replicable results are often impossible or inappropriate.

Because time can be of the essence we value emerging results and insights shared via updates, short events, websites and similar, in advance of peer reviewed articles.

Next steps

Get in touch with fcocorrespondence@fco.gov.uk

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

FCO Areas of research interest coronavirus COVID 19 update May 2020 GOVUK

Related UKRI funded projects


  • Global - The Bristol Global Engagement Network

    The University of Bristol is an international powerhouse of learning, discovery and enterprise. Its vision is of a university whose excellence is acknowledged locally, nationally and globally. International collaboration...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Bristol

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question by discussing the importance of international collaboration in research and the benefits it brings, but it does not specifically address how future international scientific collaboration will look like in a post-coronavirus world.

  • Science Advice for Policy by European Academies

    The project 'Science Advice for Policy by European Academies' (SAPEA) is part of the Scientific Advice Mechanism of the European Commission. At the request of the EC, it providestargeted scientific evidence in a timely a...

    Funded by: Horizon Europe Guarantee

    Lead research organisation: THE ACADEMIA EUROPAEA (THE ACADEMY OF EUROPE)

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project provides targeted scientific evidence to inform science advice for policy, which is relevant to understanding future international scientific collaboration post-coronavirus.

  • VOICES: The Value of Openness, Inclusion, Communication, and Engagement for Science in a post-pandemic world

    While the coronavirus pandemic's impacts have been largely negative, and in many instances catastrophic, Covid-19 also served to bring about some positive changes in the way we carry out, communicate, and engage with sci...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project partially answers the question by examining the value of openness, inclusion, and equity in the communication of science during and beyond the pandemic, but it does not specifically address how future international scientific collaboration will look like in a post-coronavirus world.

  • Science and technology in the service of the State: Understanding mission-oriented research systems in a changing world

    Mission-oriented science and technology - that is Government funded science and technology in direct support of the goals or missions of the state - has a long history and accounts for a great deal of public spending on ...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Manchester

Similar ARIs from other organisations