We are keen to hear about cutting-edge approaches the research community is using which could have applications to our work. Particularly in ground-breaking evaluations, with robust focus on impact and value for money, what works and using more innovative techniques and data sharing
The lead contacts are: Lesley Smith, Senior Principal Research Officer, Analysis, Research and Co-ordination Unit, Analysis and Data Directorate: Lesley.Smith@levellingup.gov.uk and David Hughes, Head of the Chief Scientific Adviser’s office: psChiefScientificAdviser@levellingup.gov.uk.
This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:
Public health programmes are considered to be complex because they often require people to change their behaviour and involve interventions that cut across multiple sectors. For this reason, public health programmes are ...
Funded by: MRC
Lead research organisation: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
The project aims to develop new methods to measure wellbeing, which is directly relevant to the question of measuring 'softer' outcomes and attaching a value to interventions.
Our aim is to enable policy-makers at all levels to target their decisions at improving the subjective wellbeing of their client group. The decision-makers we have in mind include those in central and local government, t...
Funded by: ESRC
Lead research organisation: London School of Economics and Political Science
The project focuses on enabling policy-makers to target decisions at improving subjective wellbeing, which is partially relevant to the question of measuring 'softer' outcomes and attaching a value to interventions.
The NHS has a limited budget and so deciding to spend money on an expensive drug means less is available for other services. NICE helps the NHS by providing guidance on whether new medicines should be made available to p...
Funded by: MRC
Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield
The project aims to develop a new measure that includes aspects of life important to quality of life, which is partially relevant to the question of measuring 'softer' outcomes and attaching a value to interventions.