Archived

What are the best ways to measure the ‘softer’ outcomes, such as changes in wellbeing, and how to attach a value to such interventions?

Background

We are keen to hear about cutting-edge approaches the research community is using which could have applications to our work. Particularly in ground-breaking evaluations, with robust focus on impact and value for money, what works and using more innovative techniques and data sharing

Next steps

The lead contacts are: Lesley Smith, Senior Principal Research Officer, Analysis, Research and Co-ordination Unit, Analysis and Data Directorate: [email protected] and David Hughes, Head of the Chief Scientific Adviser’s office: [email protected].

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

DLUHC Areas of research interest GOVUK

Related UKRI funded projects

  • Developing a wellbeing measure for public health evaluations: integrating capabilities and happiness

    Public health programmes are considered to be complex because they often require people to change their behaviour and involve interventions that cut across multiple sectors. For this reason, public health programmes are ...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project aims to develop new methods to measure wellbeing, which is directly relevant to the question of measuring 'softer' outcomes and attaching a value to interventions.

  • What Works Centre for Wellbeing - Cross-cutting strand

    Our aim is to enable policy-makers at all levels to target their decisions at improving the subjective wellbeing of their client group. The decision-makers we have in mind include those in central and local government, t...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: London School of Economics and Political Science

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on enabling policy-makers to target decisions at improving subjective wellbeing, which is partially relevant to the question of measuring 'softer' outcomes and attaching a value to interventions.

  • Wellbeing and Societal Transformation: Embedding Wellbeing Science into Policy, Interventions, and Governance

    The world is experiencing a meta-crisis of rising mental illness, social fragmentation, technological risks, and ecological collapse. To create a healthier, more connected, and sustainable future, bold thinking is needed...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: SWANSEA UNIVERSITY

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on measuring wellbeing outcomes, attaching value to interventions, and driving systemic change through wellbeing science.

  • Going beyond health related quality of life - towards a broader QALY measure for use across sectors

    The NHS has a limited budget and so deciding to spend money on an expensive drug means less is available for other services. NICE helps the NHS by providing guidance on whether new medicines should be made available to p...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project aims to develop a new measure that includes aspects of life important to quality of life, which is partially relevant to the question of measuring 'softer' outcomes and attaching a value to interventions.

  • Sheffield Hallam University and Westfield Health & Wellbeing Limited

    To develop a calibrated model to understand the impact of Health and Wellbeing Interventions on the individuals and companies who invest in them....

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

  • Valuing the health benefits of city well-being

    A large body of research shows that improvements in well-being have a significant causal impact on better health. However, these benefits have yet to be quantified. In order for local policymakers to make well-being poli...

    Funded by: Innovate UK

    Lead research organisation: HAPPY CITY C.I.C.

  • Making Wellbeing Count for Policy: Patterns and trends in personal, social and societal wellbeing in Europe and the UK.

    Recent years have seen a huge growth in interest in the concept of wellbeing, and this has been matched by a steady increase in the amount of data available for studying it. After the so-called Stiglitz report commission...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: City St George’s, University of London

  • The Many Dimensions of Wellbeing

    Government policies are often justified by their potential contribution to the growth of GDP, and yet the sense that it is a flawed measure, failing to capture much of people's experience of economic progress (or otherwi...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Cambridge

  • Methodology State-of-the-art workshop: management of measurement reactivity in trials of interventions to improve health

    Measurement reactivity has been defined as being present where measurement results in changes in the people being measured. There is evidence which show that asking people to complete questionnaires can result in changes...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Manchester

  • Validating generic preference-base measures of health in mental health populations and estimating mapping functions

    The NHS has to make some tough choices about what services to provide. One way to make these choices is to examine the value for money of services by looking at the costs and benefits they provide. A major problem for th...

    Funded by: MRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Sheffield

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on validating measures of health and estimating mapping functions, which directly relates to measuring changes in wellbeing and attaching a value to interventions.