How can we ensure an elections and registration system that is accessible for all, and maintains integrity, public confidence and trust through minimal potential for fraud?
Background
Growing our evidence base on how best to deliver electoral systems that are efficient, inclusive and fair for all
Next steps
The lead contacts are: Lesley Smith, Senior Principal Research Officer, Analysis, Research and Co-ordination Unit, Analysis and Data Directorate: Lesley.Smith@levellingup.gov.uk and David Hughes, Head of the Chief Scientific Adviser’s office: psChiefScientificAdviser@levellingup.gov.uk.
Source
This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:
Related UKRI funded projects
-
Edinburgh Napier University and Democracy Counts Limited KTP 22_23 R5
To develop a trusted end to end verification process for citizens and candidates in the electoral registration process which leads to trusted and transparent elections....
Funded by: Innovate UK
Why might this be relevant?
The project aims to develop a trusted verification process for electoral registration, ensuring integrity and transparency in elections.
-
TrustVote: Dispute-resolution mechanisms and systems for Private and Verifiable Voting
Running elections is challenging while maintaining election integrity and increased voter confidence. Recent examples have shown that both traditional and online voting systems are not sufficient resilient to achieve thi...
Funded by: EPSRC
Why might this be relevant?
The project focuses on dispute-resolution mechanisms and systems for voting, addressing election integrity and voter confidence.
-
Digital Liquid Democracy: Delegative End-to-end Verifiable E-voting
This project will model, design, analyze, and implement a novel secure, transparent end-to-end verifiable e-voting system that can enable liquid democracy. With the advancement of digital technology, developing a secure ...
Funded by: EPSRC
Why might this be relevant?
The project aims to develop a secure and transparent e-voting system that can ensure minimal potential for fraud, which directly addresses the question.