How can we better monitor and evaluate the impacts of road schemes, and other large-scale infrastructure projects, on cultural heritage sites and their users?
Background
Government is committed to ‘levelling up’, so that every corner of the country can benefit and share in future prosperity. Transport connectivity is an essential input into the efficient functioning of markets, reducing the costs of doing business and supporting linkages between key sectors of the economy. More efficient and faster delivery of major projects are fundamental to job creation and so a key lever for economic growth and our recovery from Covid-19. We are therefore enhancing the national strategic transport network, shifting the focus of DfT investment towards major projects that link the towns, cities and left behind places outside of London and the South East.
Key areas of focus are:
• More productive cities and towns
• Support local growth and regeneration
• Support jobs and skills
• Improve networks between major economic centres, and with international gateways
• Strengthening the Union
Delivery of major programmes such as HS2, the Integrated Rail Plan, TransPennine Route Upgrade, the Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail and the Roads Investment Strategy are fundamental to job creation and a key lever for economic growth and our recovery from Covid-19. Further commitments are outlined in the UK R&D Place Strategy which is being published this year as part of the UK R&D Roadmap. The research and evidence needs set out below are critical to supporting DfT deliver these major programmes and key areas of focus to grow and level up the economy.
Next steps
Get in touch with BridgetoResearch@dft.gov.uk
Source
This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:
Topics
Research fields
Related UKRI funded projects
-
The Landscapes of Post-War Infrastructure: Culture, Amenity, Heritage and Industry
This research aims to understand the value of the landscapes created around infrastructure projects in post-war Britain. As these landscapes are altered, it is important to understand their cultural value, amenity value ...
Funded by: SPF
Why might this be relevant?
The project aims to understand the value of landscapes created around infrastructure projects and develop guidelines for assessing and making decisions about these landscapes.
-
Transformation and resilience of our landscapes, archaeology and built heritage: defining responses to societal and environmental pressures
Cultural Heritage will, in the near future, be subject to substantial transformation in response to changing climate. Mitigation and adaptation measures will affect economic governance, and introduce sustainability press...
Funded by: AHRC
-
Integrating Lifetimes in Heritage Capital
ITHACA aims to articulate the economic value of caring for heritage. This project brings together an interdisciplinary team, including Associate Prof. Josep Grau-Bove (expert in damage prediction in heritage), Dr. Ricky ...
Funded by: AHRC
Why might this be relevant?
The project partially answers the question as it focuses on the economic value of caring for heritage and how the prevention of change brings value to society, but it does not specifically address the impacts of road schemes and other large-scale infrastructure projects on cultural heritage sites and their users.