How can we conduct probabilistic analysis of the likelihood of man-made risks for policy purposes where human agency is subject to particular varieties of uncertainty?

Background

The world is changing rapidly and we continue to see long-term shifts in the balance of global and military power, increasing competition between states as well as the threat from non-state actors. The challenges have become more complex and intertwined. We are inviting research organisations to consider our latest research interests in measuring and responding to security threats in a way that is evidence-led.

Next steps

Should you have questions relating to this ARI please contact co_aris@cabinetoffice.gov.uk. If your query relates to a specific question please state its title in your email.

Source

This question was published as part of the set of ARIs in this document:

CO AR Is 2019 20190429

Related UKRI funded projects

  • SALIENT: Building a Secure and Resilient World: Research and Coordination Hub

    The geopolitical and geo-economic shifts we are experiencing have stress-tested the national security and resilience of the United Kingdom. The consequences of EU Exit, COVID-19, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and other ev...

    Funded by: AHRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Manchester

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project addresses the probabilistic analysis of man-made risks for policy purposes and emphasizes the importance of risk management and resilience in the face of complex security threats.

  • Evaluating Cyber Security Evidence for Policy Advice: The Other Human Dimension

    The quality of a state's capacity to respond to the challenges of cyber security is rapidly coming to be recognised as an important element of global competitiveness. This project seeks to understand the challenges faced...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University College London

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on understanding the challenges faced by policy makers in interpreting and evaluating evidence about cyber security, which is relevant to conducting probabilistic analysis of man-made risks for policy purposes.

  • Bayesian Analysis of Competing Cyber Hypotheses

    Cyber security is recognised as important at the highest levels of international government. President Obama has said that "the Cyber threat is one of the most serious economic and national security challenges [the ...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Liverpool

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project proposes to adapt Sequential Monte Carlo samplers to become part of Analysis of Competing Hypotheses, which is partially relevant to conducting probabilistic analysis of man-made risks for policy purposes.

  • Securing Against Future Events (SaFE): Pre-emption, Protocols, and Publics

    In the decade following the events of September 11 2001, security against potential terrorist attack has significantly changed in its form and emphasis. Put simply, in many of the post-event analyses following the attack...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Durham University

    Why might this be relevant?

    The project focuses on advancing knowledge and understanding of futures-oriented and pre-emptive security techniques, which is not directly relevant to conducting probabilistic analysis of man-made risks for policy purposes.

  • CREST: Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats

    The social sciences have made important contributions to our understanding of security threats and the skills and technologies that can mitigate them. However, these contributions have yet to achieve their full impact on...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: Lancaster University

  • RBOC N+ - Resilience Beyond Observed Capabilities

    The RBOC (Resilience Beyond Observed Capabilities) Network Plus will create new knowledge, new capabilities and new opportunities for collaboration to help the UK prepare for security threats in the coming decades. The s...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: Coventry University

  • Strategic Governance of Science and Technology Pathways to Security

    For most of the 20th century warfare was understood as something that happens between nation states. Most security technology was therefore developed for conventional warfare between States, with military technologies in...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: London School of Economics and Political Science

  • Constraints on the Design of Security Policy: Insights from Audience Costs Theory and Security and Defence Elites in the United Kingdom

    This project seeks to explain how security policy is developed in the UK, and suggest how relationships between different security and defence agencies can be improved. Security policies protect the borders of a nation-s...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

  • National Security Through Partnership: Building Bridges between Research, Policy & Practice

    The key question underpinning the "National Security through Partnership" Fellowship is: how can we promote better engagement between National Security stakeholders - policy-makers and practitioners - and acade...

    Funded by: ESRC

    Lead research organisation: University of Cambridge

  • Algebra and Logic for Policy and Utility in Information Security

    Managers, consultants, and security engineers have responsibility for delivering the security of possibly large, complex systems. Policy-makers and industry/business leaders, on the other hand, have responsibility for en...

    Funded by: EPSRC

    Lead research organisation: University College London

Similar ARIs from other organisations

Increase our global Impact In security applications, how can we rely on AI to show us all the possible threats (not seeing what we are not shown)? Department for Transport, 2023
See details
Artificial Intelligence - How can we meaningfully assess the risks posed by AI and prepare for them? How can we apply the defence in depth approach to preparing for risks from AI? Department for Science, Innovation & Technology, 2024
See details